Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Institutional review boards in applied settings: their role in judgments of quality and consumer protection

Article Abstract:

R. Rosenthal believes that university institutional review boards (IRBs) should decline proposed studies of poor quality and use a cost/utility ratio to evaluate studies. Non-university IRBs already conduct reviews similar to those proposed by Rosenthal for the protection of consumers who may be research subjects. IRBs in applied backgrounds take care of fewer proposals with a much smaller range of research and have a membership of experienced individuals in the concerned field. IRBs also take care of consumer requirements in a better way than editorial board members of various professional journals. Some examples of meritless research proposals are given.

Author: Mordock, John B.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1995
Methods, Consumer protection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Long- and short-looking infants' recognition of symmetrical and asymmetrical forms

Article Abstract:

Three experiments have generally supported the hypothesis that short-looking infants process symmetrical stimuli more rapidly than asymmetrical stimuli, while this is not the case with long-looking infants. Short-looking infants successfully encode both vertically symmetrical and asymmetrical stimuli after 20 seconds of familiarization, while long-looking infants usually require a longer familiarization time before encoding either stimulus. It appears that short-looking infants may have used a global-to-local sequence in processing the stimuli.

Author: Colombo, John, Stoecker, Jennifer J.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0022-0965
Year: 1998
Research, Visual perception

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cost, utility, and judgments of institutional review boards

Article Abstract:

R. Rosenthal's concerns about the scientific merit and ethical treatment of human subjects in psychological research are reasonable as is his linking of costs and utility. However, his choice of institutional review boards to carry out this pre-review simply because they already perform a similar function is fraught with difficulties including unfamiliarity with the validity of innovative research and the strong potential for political and other agendas to influence the decisions.

Author: Colombo, John
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1995
Science and ethics, Scientific ethics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Management, Criticism and interpretation, Psychological research, Rosenthal, Robert
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Three-dimensional bilateral symmetry bias in judgments of figural identity and orientation. Perceptual bias for forward-facing motion
  • Abstracts: Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger
  • Abstracts: Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives in a repeated game with incomplete contracts. An examination of college student money management tendencies
  • Abstracts: Distractibilty in infancy: the effects of distractor characteristics and type of attention. Effects of experience and reminding on long-term recall in infancy: remembering not to forget
  • Abstracts: Suicidal ideation in high school students: depression and other correlates. Use of the modified scale for suicidal ideation with suicide ideators and attempters
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.