Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Perspectives, perceptions, and risk-taking behavior

Article Abstract:

Two experiments were conducted to empirically isolate comprehension of threat and opportunity from that of loss and gain in decision-making. The first experiment showed that most decision makers confronting traditional framing problems considered the risky option an opportunity when they were in the loss-frame condition, but a threat when they were in the gain-frame condition. A second experiment of 84 subjects showed that subjects took more risks when the problems were framed as opportunities, and were risk-averse when the problems were framed as threats.

Author: Highhouse, Scott, Yuce, Payam
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1996
Choice (Psychology), Risk-taking (Psychology), Risk taking

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The influence of social (mis)information on memory for behavior in an employment interview

Article Abstract:

Decisions made by a group may be affected by the validity of information retained by each member of the group on the object being decided upon. A group of people evaluating an interview were easily misled by false information included in notes made by its own members. However, a similarly misled group performed as well as a correctly informed group when they were told that some of the information may have been false.

Author: Highhouse, Scott, Bottrill, Karen V.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1995
Decision-making, Group, Group decision making

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Looking closer at the effects of framing on risky choice: an item response theory analysis

Article Abstract:

People who are extreme in preference for risk will not be greatly affected by the framing of an item. Utilization of item response theory methodology revealed that extreme risk-seeking people almost always choose the risky option. Compared to other framing items, anomalous statistical properties were observed for the most popularly used item in framing research, the Asian Disease item.

Author: Highhouse, Scott, Zickar, Michael J.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1998
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Analysis, Item response theory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Decision-making, Decision making
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Preparing for perception and action (I): the role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm. Developing a new quantitative account of backward masking
  • Abstracts: Expectancy priming of smoking cessation messages enhances the placebo effect of tailored interventions. Secondary smoking prevention in a university setting: a randomized comparison of an experimental, theory-based intervention and a standard didactic intervention for increasing cessation motivation
  • Abstracts: Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: Using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization
  • Abstracts: Characteristics and regulation of the ovarian cycle in Vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Assessment of menstruation in the vervet (Cercopithecus aethiops)
  • Abstracts: Emotional and behavioral problems of children living with drug-abusing fathers: comparisons with children living with alcohol-abusing and non-substance-abusing fathers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.