Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

The process of negotiating: strategy and timing as predictors of outcomes

Article Abstract:

The use of cuing and responding strategies was found to vary over time, indicating a decreasing flexibility of the negotiation process. This was gleaned from a testing of differences in the use of these strategies across four types of outcome, over time and across time and outcomes, using a simulated employment contract negotiation. High levels of positional information exchange were also found to characterize distributive outcomes, while high levels of priority information exchange characterize integrative agreements.

Author: Olekalns, Mara, Smith, Philip L., Walsh, Therese
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judgment accuracy and outcomes in negotiation: a causal modeling analysis of decision-aiding effects

Article Abstract:

The impact of interaction structure and communication channels on negotiation performance is analyzed. Unstructured and computer-mediated groups showed reduced judgment accuracy, reduced outcomes and inequitable resource allocation compared to structured and face-to-face groups. Judgment accuracy was also found to affect negotiation performance. Negotiation structure improved profits and reduced inequitable resource allocation.

Author: Dilla, William N., Arunachalam, Vairam
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1995
Decision-making, Models, Decision making

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Affect in dyadic negotiation: a model and propositions

Article Abstract:

A model is developed to describe the role of affective processes in two-party negotiations. It is shown that the role of affect is dependent on the source of a particular affect state. Affect also influences the decision to negotiate, opponent selection, expectations and offers, selection of bargaining strategies, economic and social-cognitive outcomes, and compliance with settlement terms.

Author: Oliver, Richard L., Barry, Bruce
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1996
Affect (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Negotiation, Negotiations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Affect from the top down: how powerful individuals' positive affect shapes negotiations
  • Abstracts: The effectiveness of policy and health education strategies for reducing adolescent smoking: a review of the evidence
  • Abstracts: Pattern of perceived stress and anxiety in pregnancy predicts preterm birth. Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: the role of personal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy
  • Abstracts: Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Locus of knowledge as a determinant of the effects of participation on performance, affect, and perceptions
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.