Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Ultimatum bargaining with a group: underestimating the importance of the decision rule

Article Abstract:

Ultimatum bargaining with a group is more complex for subjects, and their allocations are related to their insensitivity to the group decision rule. The results of the three experiments, which are modifications of the traditional ultimatum game, indicate that group members will likely experience difficulty in predicting or understanding group decisions. This situation is caused by the difficulty of anticipating others' cognitions accurately.

Author: Bazerman, Max H., Messick, David M., Moore, Don A.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1997
Group Dynamics, Research, Analysis, Human resource management, Interpersonal relations, Organizational behavior, Decision-making, Group, Group decision making

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Myopic prediction, self-destructive secrecy, and the unexpected benefits of revealing final deadlines in negotiation

Article Abstract:

The results of three experiments conducted with students from Northwestern University, Carnegie Mellon University and University of Pittsburgh to find out the advantages of disclosing deadlines by negotiators have been provided. The procedures used in these experiments have been discussed.

Author: Moore, Don A.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 2004
Management dynamics, Management, Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Causes of, Influence, Negotiation, Negotiations, Company business management, Forecasting, Time (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Playing for peanuts: why is risk seeking more common for low-stakes gambles?

Article Abstract:

The factors influencing the experience of "peanut effect", willingness to take risks when playing for small amounts, are explored. Results indicate that peanut effect is linked o anticipated disappointment but not to anticipated regret.

Author: Weber, Bethany J., Chapman, Gretchen B.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 2005
Usage, Decision theory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Methods, Decision-making, Decision making, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Neural connectivity in children with bipolar disorder: impairment in the face emotion processing circuit. A primer on brain imaging in developmental psychopathology: What is it good for?
  • Abstracts: The role of familial values in understanding the impact of social class on weight concern. The role of the mother-daughter relationship in explaining weight concern
  • Abstracts: Judging relative importance: direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Feedback delays: How can decision makers learn not ot buy a new car every time the garage is empty?
  • Abstracts: The mapping of visual space is a function of the structure of the visual field. Two paradoxes of pointing
  • Abstracts: Favoritism of agents - the case of referees home bias. The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.