Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Real estate industry

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Real estate industry

BHP Petroleum Great Britain Ltd v Chesterfield Properties Ltd and another

Article Abstract:

A case decided by the Chancery Division in 2001 is surveyed. Issues highlighted from the case surveyed include the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, lease agreements and dangerous structure costs.

Author: Denyer-Green, Barry
Publisher: Reed Business Information Ltd.
Publication Name: Estates Gazette
Subject: Real estate industry
ISSN: 0014-1240
Year: 2001
Cases, BHP Petroleum Great Britain Ltd, Chesterfield Properties PLC

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Barnett and another v O'Sullivan

Article Abstract:

An appeal was made in a UK court by a tenant arguing that she should not be forced to leave her rented room because her landlord was not in residence. The landlord had decided to move with the tenant to new premises, and was using both houses before making the final move. The court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the move had been planned on the understanding that the new house would be the landlord's home, and that a division of the move into stages was artificial.

Author: Denyer-Green, Barry
Publisher: Reed Business Information Ltd.
Publication Name: Estates Gazette
Subject: Real estate industry
ISSN: 0014-1240
Year: 1995
Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings, Lessors of Apartment Bldgs, Apartment building operators, Apartment building landlords

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Pennell v Payne and another

Article Abstract:

A UK legal case involved a subtenancy set up by a tenant which was in breach of the tenancy agreement. The appeal involved the tenant of a farm who was not allowed to sublet without permission. The tenant sublet to a company which worked the farm. The landlord asked the tenant to quit and was concerned that he would be left with a subtenant be did not want. An appeal court decided that the landlord could not have the subtenant foisted on him, so was not damaged by this possibility.

Author: Denyer-Green, Barry
Publisher: Reed Business Information Ltd.
Publication Name: Estates Gazette
Subject: Real estate industry
ISSN: 0014-1240
Year: 1995
Legal services, Offices of Lawyers, Lessors of Real Estate, Real Estate Operators and Lessors, Lessors of Land, Landlords

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Landlord and tenant, Landlord-tenant relations, Real estate industry
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: R v London Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, ex parte Daejan Properties Ltd. Bistern estate trust's appeal
  • Abstracts: Hunts Refuse Disposals Ltd v Norfolk Environmental Waste Services Ltd. Caradon District Council v Paton and another
  • Abstracts: U.S. economic vitality sparks surge in direct investment flows. The measure of a metro
  • Abstracts: Three rules for real estate valuation: deduction, adduction, or reduction. Valuing the property of non-real estate companies
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.