Fraser Pipestock Ltd v Gloucester City Council

Article Abstract:

A UK legal case, Fraser Pipestock Ltd V Gloucester City Council, hinged on a rent review and how the new rent should be calculated. The tenant was the plaintiff in this case and the yearly rent was defined in accordance with a clause in the lease. This offered different options such as the previous rent, a set figure, or 8% of the lessee's rack rents. The lessee did not have subtenants and argued that the rack rent could not be calculated. The court found for the plaintiff.

---

Micrografix v Woking 8 ltd

Article Abstract:

A legal case involving landlord and tenant relations related to a notice with a mistaken date of termination, and arguments as to whether this was valid. The tenants took on a lease for a 20 year period and a mistake was made in a letter to the landlord in which they asked for acknowledgement to notice to end their lease. The court's decision was that the landlords had enough information to understand the intent of the letter, despite the mistake, so the notice was valid.

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Proper coverage is critical. Keep income flowing
• Abstracts: Leasing office space: perceptions versus reality. Time to fix the office building business. The valuation virus
• Abstracts: BL set for City coup. New orthodoxy. A new dust jacket on an old plot
• Abstracts: New grist to the mill. Relieving the pressure. Freedom to move forward
• Abstracts: House in order? BPF criticises Housing Bill's new amendments. Are landlords to give up their right to forfeit?

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.