Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

A slippery slope for science; despite its upbeat rhetoric about 1997, White House budget projections through 2000 paint a grim picture for science and technology

Article Abstract:

A compromise between the Clinton administration and the congressional leadership calls for a reduction in domestic discretionary spending of almost $300 billion between 1996 and 2002. The discretionary spending fund is the source of the entire $34-billion federal civilian research and development budget.

Author: Lawler, Andrew
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1996
Analysis, Government spending policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Smoother road for R&D spending?

Article Abstract:

Pres Clinton's budget request for 1998 includes modest increases for research and development, as both Congress and the White House have reversed their attitudes toward science funding. The 1997 request included steep declines until 2000. Proposed budgets for NIH, NSF and other agencies are outlined.

Author: Lawler, Andrew
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1997
Finance, Clinton, Bill, United States. National Institutes of Health, United States. Congress, United States. National Science Foundation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Grim budgets spur call to action: science policy

Article Abstract:

Pres Clinton's science advisor Jack Gibbons and Senate Budget Committee chmn Pete Domenici, speaking at the annual science policy colloquium, agreed that present levels of R&D funding would have to come from cuts elsewhere in the budget. Each assailed the other party's proposed cuts.

Author: Lawler, Andrew
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1996
Forecasts and trends, Gibbons, John H., Domenici, Pete V.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Planning, Federal aid to research, Government aid to research, Science and technology policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Heavy metal ion adsorbents formed by the grafting of a thiol functionality to mesoporous silica molecular sieves: factors affecting Hg(II) uptake
  • Abstracts: Russian scientists gain legal rights.... Tampering allegations stall science law. Who owns results of Russian science?
  • Abstracts: Report backs science, not new station. U.S. Antarctic panel makes case for replacement station. Pressure on budget triggers review of Antarctic program
  • Abstracts: Whose DNA is it, anyway? Despite anxiety, NIH begins merging neuroscience panels
  • Abstracts: EPA says chemical use reporting proposal due in early 1997. Regional ozone group ends study; states, EPA near plan to cut NOx
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.