Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Follow the formula

Article Abstract:

The lawsuit filed by Worcester Bros Co. against the Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority illustrates how difficult sometimes it may be in using the Eichleay formula for computing unabsorbed home office expenses incurred by contractors. Several cases have held that the formula can only be used if the government was responsible for the suspension or delay of work. Contractors should also prove that they were not able to work during the suspension or delay. They are advised to monitor the issue in their states and find out if the formula is recognized in their states.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Santiago, Simon J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1999
Construction, Measurement, Overhead costs, Building

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court rules against subcontractors in contingent payment clause dispute

Article Abstract:

Pay-if-paid clauses in construction contracts are generally controversial because they force subcontractors to assume a greater economic risk because if an owner does not pay the general contractor, the subcontractors usually cannot seek payment from the general contractor. The California Supreme Court in 'Clark Corp vs. Safeco Ins. Co' ruled that such clauses violate public policy by waiving subcontractors' mechanic's lien rights. However, the case of 'Printz Services Corp vs Main Electric Ltd' illustrates that pay-if-paid clauses can be enforced.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Santiago, Simon J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1998
Clauses (Law), Contract clauses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Enforceability of monetary caps for professional negligence

Article Abstract:

The case of the Borough of Tinton Falls vs. Marbro In. examines the issue of monetary caps on liabilities for alleged negligence. Fellow, Reeds & Associates was contracted by the borough to improve a local park. However, when the project unearthed large glass quantities rendering the park unusable, the borough sued FRA for negligence. The FRA argued that their contract with the borough limited its liability to $32,500 which the Superior Court of New Jersey ruled in favor of.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Santiago, Simon J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1997
Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Negligence, Independent contractors, Tinton Falls, New Jersey

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Contracts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Soil properties and design factors influencing free-phase hydrocarbon cleanup. Quantification of the dilute sedimentary soot phase: implications for PAH speciation and bioavailability
  • Abstracts: New clean air rules may choke highway funds. Congress continues battle over Superfund reauthorization. Administration pushes new clean air rules
  • Abstracts: Elution of pyrene from activated carbon into an aqueous system containing humic acid. Identification of Exxon Valdez oil in sediments and tissues from Prince William Sound and the northwestern gulf of Alaska based on a PAH weathering model
  • Abstracts: Risk of nitrate in groundwaters of the United States - a national perspective. Nutrients in groundwaters of the conterminous United States, 1992-1995
  • Abstracts: Dark and photoassisted Fe3+-catalyzed degradation of chlorophenoxy herbicides by hydrogen peroxide. Reduction of perchloroalkanes by ferrioxalate-generated carboxylate radical preceding mineralization by the photo-Fenton reaction
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.