Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Owners' 'bad faith' can relieve contractors of notice requirements

Article Abstract:

A Supreme Court appeal court judgement added a new dimension to the law on notice requirements in construction contracts. The requirements oblige contractors to inform clients, at the appropriate time, of important changes from the original contract. Failure to do this causes the contractor to forego any claims related to the situation. However, the appeal court in the case concerning A.H.A. General Construction Inc. and the New York City Housing Authority ruled that the housing authority's acts of bad faith throughout the course of the contract relieved AHA of notice requirements.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Santiago, Simon J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1998
Construction industry, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Construction, Building, New York, New York. Housing Authority, A.H.A. General Construction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Patent versus latent contract ambiguities: who bears the increased costs of performance?

Article Abstract:

Patent and latent contract ambiguities are distinguished from each other. When a contract contains patent ambiguity, the contractor is obliged to inform the government about the ambiguity and ask guidance before starting the work. Furthermore, failure to inquire about the ambiguity puts the contractor accountable for increased costs of performance. However, if the ambiguity is determined as latent, contractor is not obliged for inquiry.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Santiago, Simon J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Public contracts, Government contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Warranty of specification-shifting risk to the contractor

Article Abstract:

Implied warranty obligations under the Spearin doctrine have been used for years, but the applicability of Spearin may have been limited by a recent case relating to a standard express warranty clause. Latent defects in an owner-specified material should not be seen as a defect in a contractor's work, but as a defect in the design, for which the owner is responsible in a design-bid-build project.

Author: Loulakis, Michael C., Santiago, Simon J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Civil Engineering
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0885-7024
Year: 1997
Analysis, Implied covenants

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Contracts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Japan starts to carve out its place in the world: environmental science. Japan pumps up budget for table-top short-pulse lasers
  • Abstracts: Follow the formula. Court rules against subcontractors in contingent payment clause dispute. Enforceability of monetary caps for professional negligence
  • Abstracts: Selenium removal by constructed wetlands: role of biological volatilization. Temporally variable freshwater sources of dissolved chromium to the San Francisco Bay Estuary
  • Abstracts: Predicting the capacity of powdered activated carbon for trace organic compounds in natural waters. Metabolites of alachlor in water: identification bymass spectrometry and chemical synthesis
  • Abstracts: Multiresidue method for determination of post-emergence herbicides in water by HPLC/ESI/MS in positive lonization mode
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.