Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Response to comment on 'An Alternative Minimum Level Definition for Analytical Quantification'

Article Abstract:

The determination of reporting limits, while dependent on the data quality objectives and quantification limit estimators of the researcher, remains to pass the the test of results that require them to measure up to the calibration function. This is due to the effect of statistical sampling, wherein an arrival to the true concentration value can only be effected by measuring the distribution of responses across a calibration function. This enables the correction of background effects.

Author: Coleman, David E., Gibbons, Robert D., Maddalone, Raymond F.
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Publication Name: Environmental Science & Technology
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0013-936X
Year: 1997
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, Statistics, Models, Analysis, Risk assessment, Statistical sampling, Sampling (Statistics), Statistics (Mathematics), Statistical decision, Statistical decision theory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Comment on "Method Detection Limits in Solid Waste Analysis." (comment on David E. Kimbrough and Janice Wakakuwa, Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 27, p. 2692, 1993)

Article Abstract:

The observation that the EPA's method detection limit procedure is highly susceptible to error and yields accurate results only under interference-free conditions is valid. However, the criticisms levied by Kimbrough and Wakakuwa are based on unwise definitions of detection and quantitation and wrong notions about accuracy. To illustrate the shortcomings of the EPA procedure, it is better to resort to traditional definitions of detection outcomes.

Author: Coleman, David E.
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Publication Name: Environmental Science & Technology
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0013-936X
Year: 1995
United States. Environmental Protection Agency

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Response to comment on "an alternative minimum level definition for analytical quantification."

Article Abstract:

Some environmental scientists fear that the proposed Alternative Minimum Level (AML) definition for analytical quantification of contaminants will become a regulatory standard that would disregard the data from laboratories that can demonstrate attainment of low detection and quantification limits. AML was not based on a collection of data from many laboratories and does not indicate the need to use interlaboratory data.

Author: Coleman, David E., Gibbons, Robert D., Maddalone, Ray
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Publication Name: Environmental Science & Technology
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0013-936X
Year: 1998
Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs, Environmental Programs, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Environmental indexes, Environmental policy, Environmental protection

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Missing no longer: International commission forges ahead to identify genocide victims. A proposition for stem cells
  • Abstracts: Dynamic processes leading to covalent bond formation for [S.sub.N]1 reactions. Excess electrons stabilized on ionic oxide surfaces
  • Abstracts: Ligand effects on dioxygen activation by copper and nickel complexes: reactivity and intermediates. Mild and neutral deprotections catalyzed by cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate
  • Abstracts: Economic contribution. Niche bikes
  • Abstracts: Finessing Fermat, again. Calculating with DNA; genetic material solves mathematical problems. Coming through madness
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.