Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Review of nondestructive evaluation techniques of civil infrastructure

Article Abstract:

It is argued that the paper 'Review of nondestructive evaluation techniques of civil infrastructure' by Rens et al (1997) is inappropriately titled because it does not accurately reflect the content. It is contended that the authors have a limited conceptualization of 'civil infrastructure,' made few references to nondestructive testing of the general concrete infrastructure, and failed to address the whole family of stress-wave nondestructive testing methods. Rens et al respond.

Author: Davis, Allen G., Rens, Kevin L., Wipf, Terry J., Klaiber, F. Wayne
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0887-3828
Year: 1999
Analysis, Infrastructure (Economics), Civil engineering, Non-destructive testing, Nondestructive testing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rethinking grant peer review

Article Abstract:

The NIH has trouble recruiting experienced scientists to serve on peer-review committees, since their compensation is relatively small and they are often discriminated against on their own grant applications. A possible solution would be to guarantee reviewers grant support for committee service.

Author: Fliesler, Steven J.
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1997
Editorial, Recruiting, United States. National Institutes of Health, Peer review committees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Peer review: the appropriate GPRA metric for research

Article Abstract:

GPRA requires federally funded basic scientific research to adhere to strategic planning, annual reporting, and metric evaluation. The administration and cost of developing systems of metrics and peer review are analyzed.

Author: Kostoff, Ronald N.
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Accounting and auditing, Federal aid to research, Government aid to research, Peer review of research grant proposals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: End bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock. Nondestructive evaluation of drilled shafts
  • Abstracts: Future farming: A return to roots. Technology infrastructure. The return on infrastructure
  • Abstracts: Anatomy of an amalgamation. Drum circle instruments. Otter-Eating Orcas
  • Abstracts: Residential construction failures caused by hurricane Andrew. First-hand account of Andrew's impact
  • Abstracts: Down detection. Satellite radar interferometry. Satellite TV comes down to Earth
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.