Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Science and technology

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Science and technology

Time to push weapons treaties - not block them

Article Abstract:

Pres. Bill Clinton and Senate Republicans should exert extra effort to ensure the ratification of two pivotal weapons treaties, namely, the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Only two major treaties have been aborted in the 20th century due to irreconcilable Senate opposition. Pres. Clinton should gain the support of high-ranking Republicans, formulate debate terms early and often, and come to an accommodation with the Senate Majority Leader.

Author: Krepon, Michael
Publisher: Technology Review, Inc.
Publication Name: MIT's Technology Review
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 1096-3715
Year: 1997
Disarmament, Nuclear arms control

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Putting teeth in the biological weapons ban

Article Abstract:

Biological weapons are inexpensive, easy to produce and hide and can cause more deaths than nuclear weapons. In April 1997, the Chemical Weapons Convention approved a treaty banning biological weapon production. Enforcement of the treaty, however, raises several issues. These include the possibility that inspection procedures will lead to the revealing of trade secrets concerning the biotechnology industry's production activities.

Author: Tucker, Jonathan B.
Publisher: Technology Review, Inc.
Publication Name: MIT's Technology Review
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 1096-3715
Year: 1998
All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing, Industrial organic chemicals, not elsewhere classified, Chemical Weapons, Biotechnology industry, Biotechnology industries, Investigations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Missile defense: the sequel

Article Abstract:

Pres Bill Clinton's high-tech missile defense program is stemming the country's efforts to cut nuclear weapons. The costly program, which is similar to the Reagan administration's Star Wars initiative, was developed to protect the country and its troops abroad from long-range nuclear attack. The effort, however, is unwarranted since there are no hostile countries that are capable of mounting a nuclear attack.

Author: Wright, David, Gronlund, Lisbeth
Publisher: Technology Review, Inc.
Publication Name: MIT's Technology Review
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 1096-3715
Year: 1997
United States, Analysis, Evaluation, Military policy, Defense programs, Antinuclear movement

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, National defense, Chemical weapons
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A river runs through them. Community health in Cameroon
  • Abstracts: The forgotten code cracker. Evaluating the threat: Does mass biopanic portend mass destruction? Apocalypse deferred; a new accelerator at Brookhaven won't destroy the world after all
  • Abstracts: Advancing current treatments for cancer. Controlling the pain of cancer
  • Abstracts: Easing pressures on U.S. fisheries. Shifting currents in fisheries policy
  • Abstracts: Many Modes of Transport For an Embryo's Signals. A fin-de-siecle achievement: charting new waters in vertebrate biology
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.