Accuracy or consequential validity: which is the better standard for job analysis data?

Article Abstract:

Research examining the standards for job analysis is presented. Particular attention is given to criteria used in evaluating the accuracy of job analysis data. It is emphasized that existent criteria are theoretical and lack consequential orientation.

Job analysis

---

Accuracy or consequential validity: which is the better standard for job analysis data?

Article Abstract:

Using traditional criteria or interrater agreement and deviations from proxy true scores to accurately evaluate job analysis is considered of little practical value. Instead, this essay suggests using criteria focusing on the consequences of job analysis data.

Research, Usage, Objectivity, Inference, Professions, Job evaluation, Criterion-referenced tests, Criterion referenced tests

---

Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well-being: an ecological level international study

Article Abstract:

Survey data on similarities and differences in the work locus of control, individualism-collectivism and job satisfaction/stress relationship among employees in 24 nations are analyzed. Additional information on managers' attitudes toward above mentioned workplace related issues is included.

World, Labor Relations, Psychological aspects, Statistical Data Included, Analysis, Surveys, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Work environment, Executives, Job stress, Corporate culture, Job satisfaction, Workers, Employee attitudes

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Introduction: Job analysis - Accuracy versus consequential validity. Accuracy in job analysis: toward an inference-based model

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.