Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Can graphology predict occupational success? Two empirical studies and some methodological ruminations

Article Abstract:

Two empirical studies for testing the validity of graphological predictions are reported. In the first, the graphologists rated bank employees on several job relevant traits, based on handwritten biographies. The scripts were also rated on the same traits by a clinical psychologist with no knowledge of graphology. The criterion was the ratings on the same traits by the employees' supervisors. The graphologists' and the clinician's correlations with the criterion were typically between 0.2 and 0.3. To test whether these validities might be attributable to the scripts' content, we developed a third method of prediction. The information in the texts (e.g., education) was systematically extracted and combined in a linear model. This model outperformed the human judges. In the second study, graphologists were asked only to judge the profession, out of 8 possibilities, of 40 successful professionals. This was done on the basis of rich (e.g., containing numbers and Latin script as well as Hebrew text), though uniform, scripts. The graphologists did not perform significantly better than a chance model. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Ben-Shakhar, Gershon, Bar-Hillel, Maya, Bilu, Yoram, Ben-Abba, Edor, Flug, Anat
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1986
Usage, Forecasts and trends, Business success, Penmanship, Vocational interests, Graphology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Psychophysiological detection through the Guilty Knowledge Technique: effects of mental countermeasures

Article Abstract:

The effects of mental countermeasures on the efficiency of pscyhophysiological detection with the Guilty Knowledge Technique were examined in a mock-crime experiment with 4 groups of participants: innocent participants who were not involved in the mock crime, guilty controls who committed the mock crime but received no countermeasure instructions, guilty participants who received countermeasure instructions, and guilty participants who received countermeasure instructions and were allowed to practice the countermeasures. The countermeasure instructions encouraged participants to recall emotional situations from their past and imagine themselves in these situations during presentation of irrelevant questions. Results revealed a significant reduction in electrodermal detection efficiency under the 2 countermeasure conditions with no differences between them. No countermeasures effects were observed with the respiration line length measure. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Ben-Shakhar, Gershon, Dolev, Karmela
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1996
Research, Testing, Physiological aspects, Guilt, Guilt (Psychology), Deception

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Misconceptions in Martin and Terris's (1991) "Predicting Infrequent Behavior: Clarifying the Impact on False-Positive Rates"

Article Abstract:

Martin and Terris (1991) recently attributed to a number of psychologists a concept they called the false-positive argument (FPA), according to which a test should not be used if an individual who fails is more likely to be qualified than unqualified, and they attempted to clarify the conditions under which the FPA may be appropriate. We argue that in none of the articles cited by Martin and Terris is the FPA truly posited and also that they failed to clarify the conditions under which the FPA might be appropriate. These conditions depend on the costs and payoffs associated with the various outcomes of the decision problem, as we demonstrate through the use of a threshold utility model. Finally, the examples used by Martin and Terris deal with the detection of deception but were discussed without proper consideration of the contexts in which lie-detection techniques are typically used. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Ben-Shakhar, Gershon, Bar-Hillel, Maya
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1993
Methods, Evaluation, Psychological tests, Psychology, Applied, Applied psychology, Lie detectors and detection, Lie detector tests

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Psychophysiology
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations
  • Abstracts: Activation theory and task design: an empirical test of several new predictions. The dimensionality of job characteristics: some neglected issues
  • Abstracts: Perceived organizational support. Conflict and organizational commitments
  • Abstracts: Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Understanding, prediction, and control as moderators of the relationships between perceived stress, satisfaction, and psychological well-being
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.