Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Celebrity privacy rights and free speech: recalibrating tort remedies for "outed" celebrities

Article Abstract:

The problem of providing gay, lesbian and bisexual celebrities and public officials with legal remedies for being outed highlights an enduring tension between free speech and the right of privacy. Existing tort law, including defamation, public disclosure of private facts and false light causes of action, fail to adequately balance public and individual interests. Tort law regarding privacy needs to be reconceptualized to acknowledge both that public figures do have some privacy rights and that outing that exposes hypocrisy can serve a legitimate public interest.

Author: Ware, Hilary E.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Remedies, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Outing (Homosexuality)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


English-only laws, informational interests, and the meaning of the First Amendment in a pluralistic society

Article Abstract:

The Arizona constitutional amendment installing English as the official state language was declared unconstitutional by the Ninth Circuit in the 1996 Yniguez case. The court cited the overbreadth of the amendment and its impact on First Amendment guarantees of freedom of expression. Issues of Anglo discrimination, equal protection, and cultural assimilation are also implicitly addressed in this decision.

Author: Stewart, Martina
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1996
Constitutional law, Language policy, Case Note, English-only movement

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The First Amendment after Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee: a different bill of rights for aliens?

Article Abstract:

The author discusses a 1998 Supreme Court ruling in Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee that the First Amendment protections for freedom of speech and association do not apply to aliens in immigration law cases.

Author: Miyamoto, Maryam Kamali
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 2000
United States, Freedom of association, Aliens

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Freedom of speech
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Location, innovation and trade: the role of localization and nation-based externalities. A simple, analytically solvable, Chamberlinian agglomeration model
  • Abstracts: Recognizing and remembering today's warriors. A GI bill for the 21st century. Illinois serves as beacon for State benefits
  • Abstracts: House prices and home owner saving behavior. The market for housing in Israel. Income variability, uncertainty and housing tenure choice
  • Abstracts: The role of affective traits and affective stats in disputants' motivation and behavior during episodes of organizational conflict
  • Abstracts: "Special needs" and the Fourth Amendment: an exception poised to swallow the warrant preference rule. The domestic Fourth Amendment rights of undocumented immigrants: on Guitterez and the tort law/immigration law parallel
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.