Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: testing hypotheses from economics of information

Article Abstract:

Propositions regarding consumers' differential skepticism for search, experience, and credence claims are tested in an experiment using adult consumers. The results provide clear support of Nelson's (1970) hypotheses that consumers are more skeptical of experience than search attribute claims and more skeptical of subjective than of objective claims. No support is found, however, for the Darby and Karni (1973) hypotheses that consumers will be more skeptical of credence than of experience attribute claims or for the hypothesis that consumers will not be less skeptical of experience claims for low-priced goods. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Swasy, John L., Ford, Gary T., Smith, Darlene B.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Consumer Research
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0093-5301
Year: 1990
Psychological aspects, Advertising, Consumer behavior, Motivation research (Marketing)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rhetorical question, summarization frequency, and argument strength effects on recall

Article Abstract:

Summarizing rhetorical questions were used in a sales presentation for a new product. In a high involvement setting, grammatical form, summarization frequency, and argument strength were manipulated. Unlike results of past studies, rhetoricals reduced argument recall. Furthermore, using more rhetoricals paired with strong arguments decreased recall, but using more rhetoricals with weak arguments did not. Message acceptance, thought verbalization, and self-reported distraction data were consistent with our recall findings. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Swasy, John L., Munch, James M.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Consumer Research
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0093-5301
Year: 1988
Usage, Product development, Advertising research

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Examining the target of receiver elaborations: rhetorical question effects on source processing and persuasion

Article Abstract:

An earlier study by Petty, Cacioppo and Heesacker published in 1981 on the effects of rhetorical questions is extended in order to demonstrate how important it is to consider the target of the receivers' elaborations in theory testing and development. New insights into how rhetorical questions influence persuasion are provided by the examination of source-related elaborations, and implications for the Elaboration Likelihood Model are examined.

Author: Swasy, John L., Munch, James M.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Consumer Research
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0093-5301
Year: 1985
Communication, Communications, Consumers, Information theory, Human information processing, Persuasion (Rhetoric)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Analysis, Rhetoric
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Crossover of stress, strain and resources from one spouse to another. Excessive role demand and subsequent performance
  • Abstracts: Characteristics of substance-abusing women on welfare: findings from the evaluation of CASAWORKS for Families pilot demonstration
  • Abstracts: Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights
  • Abstracts: Goal control of attention to advertising: the Yarbus implication. Media transportation and advertising
  • Abstracts: Characterizing occupations with data from the 'Dictionary of Occupational Titles.' Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.