Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Detention at Guantanamo Bay: a linguistic challenge to law

Article Abstract:

The US has claimed that the prisoners it holds as a result of the 2001-2002 military action in Afghanistan are not prisoners of war, but "enemy combatants" not subject to the protections of the Geneva Convention. But the restrictions of the Convention cannot be avoided simply by chaging the term applied to the prisoners. Holding the prisoners indefinitely, subject to interrogation, but not formally charged with any crime, is a violation of international law.

Author: Sweeney, Michael J.D.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 2003
Detention of persons, Detention, Prisoners of war, Criminal procedure (International law), Afghanistan Conflict, 2001-

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The debate over war powers

Article Abstract:

The Bush administration and its supporters have advanced several theories explaining why the primary war-making power rests with the president. However, the US Constitution clearly states that the president must seek Congressional authority to make war except in cases of invasion. Preemptive strikes against so-called "rogue nations" must be authorized by Congress in advance.

Author: Shulman, Mark R., Lee, Lawrence J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 2003
Presidents (Government), Powers and duties, War and emergency powers, Executive power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Jus ad bellum: law regulating resort to force

Article Abstract:

The use of force is strictly limited in international law according to the United Nations charter. Only in cases of self-defense against a direct threat may nations use force not approved by the UN Security Council. The use of force by the United States against Iraq does not meet this standard.

Author: Deller, Nicole, Burroughs, John R.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 2003
National security, Intervention (International law), Military intervention, Violence (Law), Force (Law), Self-defense (International law), Self defense (International law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Government regulation, Iraq War, 2003-
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: On resonance: a critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Self-gifts: phenomenological insights from four contexts
  • Abstracts: Strategic bridging: the collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products
  • Abstracts: A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: a methodological or conceptual artifact?
  • Abstracts: A test of reciprocal causality for absenteeism. Minor illness as a legitimate reason for absence. Is there a link between family structure and women's and men's managerial career advancement?
  • Abstracts: A second lease on life for technological forecasting. Technological forecasting at the stock market. Technological substitutions in the computer industry
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.