Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Equity and workplace status: a field experiment

Article Abstract:

In a field experiment, 198 employees in the underwriting department of a large insurance company were randomly assigned on a temporary basis to the offices of either higher, lower, or equal-status coworkers while their own offices were being refurbished. The present study tested the hypothesis derived from equity theory, that the status value of the temporary office would create increases, decreases, or no change in organizational outcome levels. The resulting pattern of performance supported equity theory. Specifically, relative to those workers reassigned to equal-status offices, those reassigned to higher status offices raised their performance (a response to overpayment inequity) and those reassigned to higher status offices lowered their performance (a response to underpayment inequity). As hypothesized, the size of these performance changes were directly related to the magnitude of the status inconsistencies encountered. The value of these findings in extending equity theory to the realm of nonmonetary outcomes is discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Greenberg, Jerald
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1988
Employee motivation, Social status, Labor productivity, Incentives (Business)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends?

Article Abstract:

In a laboratory study, 192 undergraduate students performed a task for which they received either high, medium, or low monetary outcomes as a result of a fair or unfair procedure. Subjects reported that medium and high outcomes were fair regardless of the procedure used, but that low outcomes were only fair when they were based on a fair procedure. The outcomes received, however, had no impact on ratings of the fairness of the procedures used. These results corroborated earlier findings from the dispute-resolution literature, but extend them to reward-distribution contexts in which different manipulations of procedural justice were used. The limitations of equity theory in accounting for improprieties in organizational procedures is discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Greenberg, Jerald
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1987
Methods, Pay equity, Achievement motivation, Incentive (Psychology), Reward (Psychology), Rewards (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. The conflict-positive organization: it depends upon us
  • Abstracts: Employees' reactions to problematic events: a circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction
  • Abstracts: Reflections on the nature of cultural distributions and the units of culture problem. Culture-bearing units and the units of culture: an introduction
  • Abstracts: Fuzzy seasonal time series for forecasting the production value of the mechanical industry in Taiwan. Applied hybrid grey model to forecast seasonal time series
  • Abstracts: Technological clusters with a knowledge-based principle: evidence from a Delphi investigation in the French case of the life sciences
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.