Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

A multi-rater assessment of organizational commitment: are self-reported measures biased?

Article Abstract:

Research investigating the factors determining self-report measures with respect to work commitment is presented. Particular attention is given to applying three rater sources in surveying 79 administrative staff, namely self, supervisor and peer perspectives.

Author: Goffin, Richard D., Gellatly, Ian R.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 2001
Surveys, Employee loyalty

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A multi-rater assessment of organizational commitment: are self-report measures biased?

Article Abstract:

Most studies on organizational commitment rely on self-reporting but the accuracy of such assessments is often in doubt. A new study assesses two kinds of organizational commitment from the perspective of self, peer and supervisor reporting.

Author: Goffin, Richard D., Gellatly, Ian R.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 2001
Organizational behavior

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Organizational commitment and job performance: it's the nature of the commitment that counts

Article Abstract:

In this study, we examined relations between the performance of first-level managers in a large food service company and their affective commitment (i.e. emotional attachment to, identification with, and involvement in the organization), continuance commitment (i.e. perceived costs associated with leaving the company), and job satisfaction. Commitment and satisfaction scores were correlated with three indexes of performance obtained from the managers' immediate supervisors. As predicted, affective commitment correlated positively and continuance commitment correlated negatively with all three measures of performance. Job satisfaction did not correlate significantly with performance ratings. The findings are interpreted as illustrating the importance of distinguishing between commitment based on desire and commitment based on need and as supporting organizational efforts to foster effective commitment in their employees. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Goffin, Richard D., Gellatly, Ian R., Meyer, John P., Paunonen, Sampo V., Jackson, Douglas N.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
Job satisfaction, Regression analysis, Commitment (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Performance standards, Job performance standards
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in complex products and systems: the case of the aircraft engine control system
  • Abstracts: The role of dispositions, entry stressors, and behavioral plasticity theory in predicting newcomers' adjustment to work
  • Abstracts: Understanding workplace empowerment as inclusion: a historical investigation of the discourse of difference in the United States
  • Abstracts: Institutions and technology: Frameworks for understanding organizational change: The case of a major ICT outsourcing contract
  • Abstracts: Statistical models for causation: what inferential leverage do they provide? The fifth cell: correlation bias in U.S. Census adjustment
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.