Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Organizational determinants of leader behavior and authority

Article Abstract:

We examined the effects of technology, the organization's dependence on a section or unit to attain its mission, labor union strength in the workplace, and managerial pressure for close, strict supervision on four dimensions of leader behavior and leader authority to direct work. Data on leadership came from 160 first-line supervisors in 12 sections of a manufacturing plant. Regression analyses showed that technology, union strength, and management pressure contributed significantly to responsive leader behavior. Supervisors in long-linked technologies spent more time on work-group maintenance; supervisors in intensive technologies spent more time on developing and maintaining links with other administrative units; supervisors in heavily unionized sections interacted with subordinates more according to written rules and regulations; and supervisors whose upper level managers favored close, strict supervision responded by pushing subordinates to work in a punitive manner. Technology dominated the prediction equation for authority. Supervisors in intensive technologies had more authority than supervisors in long-linked technologies. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Hammer, Tove H., Turk, Jay M.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1987
Social aspects, Technology, Leadership

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Two (or More?) dimensions or organizational commitment: reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales

Article Abstract:

Two distinct views of organizational commitment have developed, one that regards it as attitudinal and the other as behavioral. Meyer and Allen (1984) acknowledged the importance of both approaches (labeling them affective and continuance commitment) and developed scales for measuring each. The present study reexamined some psychometric properties of these scales. The affective commitment scale appeared to be unidimensional and had good internal consistency reliability. For the continuance commitment scale, however, two distinct dimensions were identified. The first reflected commitment based on few existing employment alternatives, and the second reflected commitment based on personal sacrifice associated with leaving the organization. Affective commitment was correlated significantly and negatively with the first dimension (low alternatives) and significantly and positively with the second dimension (high personal sacrifice). Recommendations for future use of these scales are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Ford, Robert C., McGee, Gail W.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1987
Usage, Commitment (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Role conflict and role ambiguity: do the scales measure these two constructs?

Article Abstract:

Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the conflict and ambiguity scales developed by Rizzo, House, and Lirtzman (1970). Alternative models were contrasted to evaluate the possibilities that (a) the 14 items comprising the scales do measure the two purported constructs, (b) the 14 items measure only one construct, or (c) the 14 items load complexly on a second-order factor model. The second-order factor model was superior across three independent subject samples (total n=913), indicating that these measures do not establish role conflict and role ambiguity as two factorially independent constructs. The authors conclude that alternative scales are needed; suggestions for scale development are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: McGee, Gail W., Seers, Anson, Ferguson, Carl E., Jr.
Publisher: American Psychological Association, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
Measurement, Psychological tests, Role conflict, Scale analysis (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Analysis, Organizational behavior, Psychology, Applied, Applied psychology
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ignoring irrelevant information: situational determinants of consumer learning. The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making
  • Abstracts: The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior
  • Abstracts: Intergenerational transmission of political party preference in the Netherlands. Parental background and lifestyle differentiation in Eastern Europe: social, political, and cultural intergenerational transmission in five former socialist societies
  • Abstracts: Big-B versus Big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior? In praise of context
  • Abstracts: How important are dispositional factors as determinants of job satisfaction? Implications for job design and other personnel programs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.