Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

The Texas Ten Percent Plan

Article Abstract:

The Texas Ten Percent Plan allows the top ten percent of graduating high school students in the state to be admitted to any state university automatically. The plan was prompted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit's decision in Hopwood v. Texas, which ended the use of affirmative action programs in higher education admissions. The Plan has not significantly increased the number of miniority enrollees at Texas state universities as hoped, but has shown the need to improve secondary education for minority students.

Author: Holley, Danielle, Spencer, Delia
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1999
Texas, Laws, regulations and rules, Universities and colleges, College admissions, Minority college students

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Justice O'Connor's blind rationalization of affirmative action jurisprudence

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena extended the strict scrutiny standard of review to federal affirmative action programs such as the minority set-aside program at issue in the case. The Court's hostility toward affirmative action programs will make it very difficult to withstand constitutional challenge. Before this case, the Court had drawn a distinction between state and local programs and federal programs, showing greater deference to Congressional action.

Author: Ashar, Sameer M., Opoku, Lisa F.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1996
Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Multiple masculinities: a new vision for same-sex harassment law

Article Abstract:

The method of 'sex flipping' used by the Supreme Court in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services for determining when same-sex harassment is 'because of sex' is inadequate because it does not consider the triangular relationship between sex, gender, and sexuality. The courts must address gender identities not conforming to the masculine or feminine ideals. In doing so, they will facilitate the social movement toward gender plurality.

Author: Toker, Rachel L.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1999
Sexual harassment, Sex discrimination against men

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Affirmative action, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The implications of multiple perspectives on power for organization development. Methodological observations on applied behavioral science
  • Abstracts: The First Amendment, the politics of religion and the symbols of government. Neglected stories and the lawfulness of Roe v. Wade
  • Abstracts: Measuring the impacts of community development initiatives: A new application of the adjusted interrupted time-series method
  • Abstracts: The Past and Future of Home- and Community-Based Long-Term Care. Nutrition in War and Peace
  • Abstracts: A politics of the emergent: Cultural studies in South Africa. Cultural studies and politics in India today
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.