Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

The 'problem' of the psychological contract considered

Article Abstract:

David E. Guest's (1998) arguments regarding psychological contracts are based on misconceptions and therefore need clarification. One particular flaw in Guest's reasoning is his assertion that the concept of the psychological contract is based on the inappropriate use of a legal metaphor. He went on to say that the psychological contract is a metaphor and not a construct. However, there is substantial empirical evidence to prove the construct validity of the psychological contract. These include the consistent findings by researchers that violation of the psychological contract differs significantly from unmet expectations and the highly differing responses between individuals with transactional contracts and those with relational ones.

Author: Rousseau, Denise M.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Assessing psychological contracts: issues, alternatives and measures

Article Abstract:

The limitations of existing empirical research on psychological contracts can be adequately addressed using multiple assessment methodologies. This approach to operationalizing psychological contracts involves content measures that focus on the terms of the contract for which individuals are responsible as well as feature measures that evaluate the characteristics of the psychological contract itself. Another important feature of the multiple assessment framework is the use of evaluation measures to compare judgments made by individuals in the context of the contract.

Author: Rousseau, Denise M., Tijoriwala, Snehal A.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Why workers still identify with organizations

Article Abstract:

Workers still identify with organizations because of an inherent desire to belong to a social system. Situated identification provide better chances of effectively organizing new forms of work by spearheading a collective sense of common interest among all workers. Deep structure identification is often seen in high involvement work systems, and for workers of full-time, permanent or core role who get wider and better array of organizational rewards.

Author: Rousseau, Denise M.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Organizational Behavior
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0894-3796
Year: 1998
Employee Relations NEC, Industrial sociology, Employee loyalty

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Psychological aspects, Analysis, Labor relations, Organizational change, Organizational behavior, Industrial psychology, Industrial-organizational psychology
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration. Employment relationships and firm performance: evidence from an emerging economy
  • Abstracts: The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models. Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation
  • Abstracts: Differential perceptions of employers' inducements: implications for psychological contracts. Expectations of organizational mobility, workplace social inclusion, and employee job performance
  • Abstracts: Mapping the frontiers: theoretical advances in consumer research on memory, affect, and persuation. When more may be less: the effects of regulatory focus on responses to different comparative frames
  • Abstracts: The impact of technology characteristics and job control on worker mental health. Further evidence on some new measures of job control, cognitive demand and production responsibility
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.