Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Winch and instrumental pluralism

Article Abstract:

Peter Winch, like Ludwig Wittgenstein, rejects the instrumentalist interpretation of magic and religion in favor of an expressivist interpretation. Their argument is based on instrumentalist monism, the notion that there is only one valid form of instrumental rationality. However, Winch's analysis is also consistent with instrumental pluralism, though he does not seem to have accepted it himself. According to instrumental pluralism, societies may develop different criteria for instrumental rationality, and therefore traditional religion and magic could be interpreted as rational, instrumental practices.

Author: Lerner, Berel Dov
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1995
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Religion, Pluralism, Instrumentalism (Philosophy), Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Winch, Peter

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Winch and instrumental pluralism: a response to my critics

Article Abstract:

Analysis of magic and other metaphysical practices could be used for studying different cultures. However, critics of this approach contend that magic should not be considered as a sociological tool since it defies practical logic. Advocates, on the other hand, believe that as long as a particular tool is being used, it can be examined from a sociological standpoint. Whether or not that tool would be deemed useful by the sociologist's own culture, is irrelevant.

Author: Lerner, Berel Dov
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1998
Social aspects, Methods, Sociology, Sociological methods, Parapsychology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Winch and instrumental pluralism: a reply to B.D. Lerner

Article Abstract:

The human reasoning process should be analyzed within the context of the actual thinking process. This is in opposition to Berel Dov Lerner's argument that the origins of contradictory systems of reasoning can be justified on their own terms, without having to rely upon an epistemologically acceptable instrumental pluralism. Due to cognitive limitations, humans are driven to construct alternative epistemologies by which to view and understand the world.

Author: Keita, L.D.
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0048-3931
Year: 1997
Criticism and interpretation, Philosophers, Reasoning, Lerner, Berel Dov

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Magic
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Coping with environmental pressures: public research organizations responses to funding crises. Impact of the length of relationships upon the use of research institutes by SMEs
  • Abstracts: Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Innovation and inter-firm linkage: new implications for policy
  • Abstracts: The relationship between moral reasoning and plagiarism in accounting courses: a replication study. Sink or swim: textbook reading behavior of introductory accounting students
  • Abstracts: Computone Corporation: an instructional case in earnings management and revenue recognition. Using case materials to research professional standards on revenue recognition issues
  • Abstracts: Design science and organization development interventions: Aligning business and humanistic values. Designing and testing an OD intervention: Reporting intellectual capital to develop organizations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.