Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Sociology and social work

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Sociology and social work

Implications of attitude change theories for numerical anchoring: anchor plausibility and the limits of anchor effectiveness

Article Abstract:

This article compares the effects of moderate and extreme numerical anchors, or values presented to influence decision-making, on subsequent numerical judgements. Results indicate that extreme anchors, or numbers outside the range of plausibility, have less influence over numerical judgements than moderate anchors.

Author: Wegener, Duane T., Petty, Richard E., Detweiler-Bedell, Brian T., Jarvis, W. Blair G.
Publisher: Academic Press, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-1031
Year: 2001
Decision-making, Decision making, Perception, Perception (Psychology), Attitude change

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Think unto others: the self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes

Article Abstract:

This article examines the negative effects of racial stereotyping on the behavior of the biased individual. Findings indicate that subjects who were primed with a negative stereotype of African Americans obtained significantly lower scores on a subsequent math test when compared to control subjects.

Author: Petty, Richard E., Jarvis, W. Blair G., Wheeler, S. Christian
Publisher: Academic Press, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-1031
Year: 2001
Statistical Data Included, Research, Testing, Human behavior, Racism, Stereotype (Psychology), Stereotypes (Psychology), Priming (Psychology), Mathematical ability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Flexible correction processes in social judgment: correcting for context-induced contrast

Article Abstract:

A study exploring the flexible correction processes in social judgment was conducted on 361 psychology undergraduates from the State University of Ohio in four experiments. Results were analyzed in light of four models of context correction; namely, the set/reset model, the inclusion/exclusion model and the flexible correction model of bias. Results indicate that there is not enough substantive evidence that supports the view that context correction processes causes judgmental contrast.

Author: Wegener, Duane T., Petty, Richard E.
Publisher: Academic Press, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-1031
Year: 1993
Human information processing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Psychological aspects, United States, Judgment, Judgment (Psychology)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Explanations on implementation rules for birth-planning policies and rule of the whole region (Tibet Birth-Planning Document No. 6/1987, Trial Draft)
  • Abstracts: Dynamic typology clustering within the stages of change for smoking cessation. Cluster subtypes within stage of change in a representative sample of smokers
  • Abstracts: Automatic stereotypes vs. automatic prejudice: sorting out the possibities in the Payne (2001) weapon paradigm
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.