Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Sociology and social work

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Sociology and social work

Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to determine whether the use of a strategy that separated the effects of conditioned and primary reinforcers which include terminal-link presentations that do not end with food can be observed in a within-subject comparison. Findings indicated that whenever there is a sudden increase in the number of terminal-link stimuli, subject learn that there is no increase in primary reinforcement. The subjects have difficulty in discriminating between two terminal links when the same terminal-link stimulus leads to a low probability of primary reinforcement for one alternative but a higher probability for another.

Author: Mazur, James E.
Publisher: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publication Name: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-5002
Year: 1999
Animal behavior, Stimulus intensity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers

Article Abstract:

Analysis of the study conducted on Four White Carneau pigeons that were maintained at around 80% of their free-feeding weights reveals that with the occurrence of green houselights under both reinforcement and nonreinforcement trials, preference for the green key lessened. The red and green houselights functioned as conditioned reinforces. Preference for the green key rose when 50% of the trials had 10-s green houselights followed by food and the rest of had no green houselights followed by no food.

Author: Mazur, James E.
Publisher: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publication Name: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-5002
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Contiguity and conditioned reinforcement in probabilistic choice

Article Abstract:

Probabilistic reinforcement studies show that conditioned reinforcement affects suboptimal choice and that the response from 50% reinforcement alternative is greater than the response from 100% reinforcement alternative. Experiments using pigeons have established that a conditioned punisher response is not identified after blackout. Delays following terminal-link stimuli at 100% and 50% alternatives are observed.

Author: McDevitt, Margaret A., Dunn, Roger, Spetch, Marcia L.
Publisher: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publication Name: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0022-5002
Year: 1997
Conditioned response, Conditioned responses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Reinforcement (Psychology), Sensory reinforcement
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited
  • Abstracts: The changing political participation of postcommunist citizens. National identity and democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe
  • Abstracts: Partnerships for community development and housing. Relocated homes provide affordable housing. An H/CD legislative review
  • Abstracts: A preliminary report on ego development in nonoffending mothers of sexually abused children. The helping alliance in work with families where children have been abused or neglected
  • Abstracts: Effects of reinforcement amount on attack induced under a fixed-interval schedule in pigeons. Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.