Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Anecdotes, training, trapping and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states?

Article Abstract:

There is no clear evidence that animals can attribute mental states, or hold beliefs about other animals, and none of three techniques currently used, trapping, anecdotes or training in conditional discrimination, are likely to be helpful in finding evidence of these states. It is possible that such evidence could be found through conditional discrimination combined with subsequent transfer testing, using triangulation procedures. The influence of inferential learning about interactants has sometimes been ignored, while the link between behaviorism and attribution of mental states has been misunderstood, and these are among the factors which have hindered progress in understanding this issue.

Author: Heyes, C.M.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1993
Behaviorism (Psychology), Behaviorism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Self-recognition in primates: further reflections create a hall of mirrors

Article Abstract:

Gallup et al make a convincing but unsuccessful argument in support of primate self-recognition. Despite the mass of studies and experiments on the matter, the fact remains that there is yet no convincing evidence of self-recognition or mirror-guided body inspection in animals. The arguments cited by proponents of primate self-recognition are based on poorly-designed experiments, unreliable measurements, false inferences and anecdotal observations.

Author: Heyes, C.M.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1995
Behavior, Primates

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Self-recognition in primates: irreverence, irrelevance and irony

Article Abstract:

Mitchell's criticisms of the self-recognition theory relies on his unfounded belief that looking is an observable property of behavior. Looking does not mean seeing or using information from the object. The two explanations for self-recognition are not contradictory, as each hypothesis has distinct targets. Neither of the hypotheses describes the explanation for mirror self-recognition. The anaesthetic hypothesis is defended, stating reasons.

Author: Heyes, C.M.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1996
Self-management (Psychology), Self management (Psychology), Mitchell, Robert W.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Criticism and interpretation, Animal behavior
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Integrating economics into priority setting and evaluation in conservation management. Distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across a boreal forest - clearcut ecotone
  • Abstracts: Response of fall-staging brant and Canada geese to aircraft overflights in southwestern Alaska
  • Abstracts: Cooperative hunting and group size: assumptions and currencies. Sex-biased dispersal in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus
  • Abstracts: How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. A functional neuroanatomy of hallucinations in schizophrenia
  • Abstracts: Where do rabbits and kin fit in? Origins of rodents and guinea-pigs. Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies)
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.