Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

European grants to face ethics scrutiny

Article Abstract:

The European Union may consider the ethical aspects of life science research proposals prior to awarding grants under its Framework programme due to commence at end-1998. The programme already requires research to meet basic ethical principles. Human cloning and human germline gene therapy will not be given research funding. The Group of Advisers on the Ethics of Biotechnology believes the moral and social effects of research should be taken into account, while safety issues should be deemed more important than scientific freedom.

Author: Butler, Declan
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Research, Finance, Social policy, European Union, Life sciences, Research grants, Research funding

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


WHO's bioethics code likely to stir debate

Article Abstract:

It is likely that a set of bioethics principles being created by the World Health Organization will attract controversy. The guidelines, which include a call for all research results from human genome projects to be made public, will probably be promulgated as an international declaration in the longer term. A number of scientists have been critical of elements of the guidelines, including the statement that experiments in developing countries should be approved by ethical bodies in those countries.

Author: Butler, Declan
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1999
Planning, World Health Organization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Bioethics needs better input from public'

Article Abstract:

A one day conference in Paris, attended by top scientists, legal experts and politicians, looked at the different approaches of France and Britain to resolving bioethical isues, and ways of reaching international agreement. Most delegates agreed that restricting debate on scientific advances affecting society to expert committees was outdated, and that decision-making should be more open to improve public confidence.

Author: Butler, Declan
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Conferences, meetings and seminars

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Bioethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Nuclear isomers in superheavy elements as stepping stones towards the island of stability. A triplet of differently shaped spin-zero states in the atomic nucleus 186Pb
  • Abstracts: 'Frontiers' grants count cost of success. Heat rises over Brussels FP5 proposals. Brussels bids for framework 'top-up' funds
  • Abstracts: Call for Europe to 'revitalize efforts' in basic research. 'More effectiveness needed' in Brussels' handling of research
  • Abstracts: Social constraints on the onset of incubation in a neotropical parrot: a nestbox addition experiment. Assessing parental effort in a Neotropical parrot: a comparison of methods
  • Abstracts: Costs of egg ventilation for male common gobies breeding in conditions of low dissolved oxygen. The influence of oxygen stress on female choice for male nest structure in the common goby
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.