Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

FBI attaches strings to its DNA database

Article Abstract:

The FBI is refusing to allow genetics researcher Seymour Geisser access to its database of human DNA samples unless he allows an FBI scientist to examine his work and be listed as a co-author. Genetics researchers are denouncing the policy as censorship and are demanding that the FBI grant free access to the database as urged by a National Academy of Science report. However, the FBI declared that it is still developing its policy on the database but that it is reluctant to allow free access lest the data be misinterpreted to denigrate the behavior of some population subgroups.

Author: Anderson, Christopher
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Information services, Human genetics, Databases, United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Genetic research

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Panel calls for technology company

Article Abstract:

The National Academy of Sciences issued a report advocating that the US government set up an independent technology corporation to assist high-technology industry in keeping up with foreign competition. The proposed corporation, fashioned after the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency, is meant to reverse the drop in research and development spending and technology transfer that threaten US high-technology's future. However, the report lacked detail on exactly how the corporation would function.

Author: Anderson, Christopher
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Planning, High technology industry, Industrial research, Research and development contracts, Government, Government research and development contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report

Article Abstract:

Courts in California, Massachusetts and Guam have decided that DNA fingerprinting is not admissible as evidence despite an Apr 1992 National Academy of Sciences report that recommended the admission of such evidence. The California Court of Appeals, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and the US District Court of Guam found that the persistent scientific doubts about the reliability of DNA fingerprinting mean that this technique fails the Frye test for legal admissibility.

Author: Anderson, Christopher
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Cases, DNA testing, DNA identification

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Reports, National Academy of Sciences
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Beta-Lactam antibiotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate transporter expression. Modulation of the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 by the interacting protein GTRAP3-18
  • Abstracts: NIH launches surprise Gallo investigation. Robert Gallo forced off NIH stage after HHS vetoes public briefing
  • Abstracts: Blockade of DII4 inhibits tumor growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Gridlock in the blood
  • Abstracts: Queen number influences the primary sex ratio in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (=Iridomyrmex humilis)
  • Abstracts: Japan opens up to foreign researchers. Trying to shake Japan's faith in forecasts. When silence isn't golden
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.