Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Reliability of relative predictions in population viability analysis

Article Abstract:

This article examines the veracity of the population viability analysis to make reliable predictions of the risks of extinction of biological species. Research indicates that the predicted changes in risks of decline within 100 years are more reliable than absolute predictions as shown by analyzing 10 years data. Results show that across 160 samples, the true and predicted risk are 0.59 and 0.89 for 10 and 100 years data, respectively.

Author: Possingham, Hugh P., McCarthy, Michael A., Andelman, Sandy J.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Conservation Biology
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0888-8892
Year: 2003
United States, Australia, Analysis, Population density, Population biology, Prediction theory, Test reliability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A method for setting the size of plant conservation target areas

Article Abstract:

A set of concepts and formulas that can be used in lieu of detailed population viability studies and habitat modeling exercises to determine the protected areas required to provide desirable conservation outcomes for a suite of threatened plant species is outlined. The tools presented in the study provide a fast, transparent and explicit means of assessing the conservation requirements of plants.

Author: Burgman, Mark A., Possingham, Hugh P., Lynch, A. Jasmyn J., Keith, David A., McCarthy, Michael A., Hopper, Stephen D., Devries, Robert J., Passioura, Jason A., Drury, Wendy L.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Conservation Biology
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0888-8892
Year: 2001
Habitat (Ecology), Habitats, Plant conservation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Consistency of Extinction Risk Classification Protocols

Article Abstract:

Three broadly used systematic conservation classification protocols are assessed for accuracy of extinction risk prediction, and causes of discrepancies are identified. Findings emphasize the importance adequate training and the representation of uncertainties in calculations and reports.

Author: Burgman, Mark A., Master, Lawrence L., Mace, Georgina M., Keith, David A., McCarthy, Michael A., Andelman, Sandy J., Regan, Tracey J.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Conservation Biology
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0888-8892
Year: 2005
Product information, Models, Testing, Comparative analysis, Nature conservation, Scientific models

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Extinction (Biology)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Forest fire prediction and prevention in the Brazilian Amazon. Rethinking tropical forest conservation: Perils in parks
  • Abstracts: Correlates of population recovery goals in endangered birds. Using population viability analysis to develop recovery criteria for endangered insects: case study of the Fender's blue butterfly
  • Abstracts: Effectiveness in conservation practice: Pointers from medicine and public health. Cash interests taint drug advice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.