Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Row over plan to treat plants as 'pesticides.'

Article Abstract:

The US Environment Protection Agency's (EPA) proposal to bring toxic producing genetically engineered plants within its regulatory boundaries has raised a controversy. The regulation entails mandatory approval for plant pesticides for late-stage development and marketing. Eleven organisations including the American Institute of Biological Sciences and the American Society for Microbiology believe EPA's conclusion to be unscientific. Other agencies, such as the Biotechnology Industry Association and the Environmental Defense Fund support the EPA.

Author: Wadman, Meredith
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1996
Health aspects, Laws, regulations and rules, Plants, Plants (Organisms), United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Plant genetic engineering

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


$100m payout after drug data withheld

Article Abstract:

Knoll Pharmaceutical of New Jersey, a pharmaceutical company and subsidiary of BASF of Germany, is to pay almost $100 million in an out of court settlement to patients who have taken Synthroid an anti-hypothyroidism drug. The company is said to have suppressed research findings showing that the drug was no more effective than cheaper drugs. Consumer activists have complained that the settlement to around five million patients is too small.

Author: Wadman, Meredith
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Finance, Knoll Pharmaceutical Co.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Genome panel defends researchers' - and families' - interests

Article Abstract:

The organization coordinating the work of genome researchers has been criticized for its latest recommendations. It wants scientists to retain the ability to gather further information about DNA samples from subjects' medical records. The ethics committee of the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) wants research samples to be stored and used for other research, but it has strong reservations about the irreversible stripping of information.

Author: Wadman, Meredith
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1998
Usage, Ethical aspects, Medical records, Human Genome Organization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Trans-species transplant raise virus fears. Make marijuana research easier, panel urges NIH. Call for human subjects monitoring body
  • Abstracts: Diversity project: Cavalli-Sforza answers his critics. Genome ethics chair resigns amid worries over autonomy
  • Abstracts: Glutamate mediates an inhibitory postsynaptic potential in dopamine neurons. Localization of dopamine D4 receptors in GABAergic neurons of the primate brain
  • Abstracts: From bench to bedside ... research makes the translational transition. Flexibility the key for neuroscientists
  • Abstracts: Social needs proposed as priority for EU research. Moscow's 'missing fossils' come under scrutiny. UK waives nuclear waste rule for Georgia
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.