Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

Transfer and interference in bumblebee learning

Article Abstract:

Bees are unable to generalize from one learning incident to another in the needed way, but they can learn to alternate between some special tasks without reduction in performance. Experiments on bumblebees, Bombus occidentalis, show no evidence for positive transfer from one related task to another. There is an initial reduction in performance after switching from task 2 back to task 1. Bees stop showing an initial reduction in performance after switching, if trained to switch back and forth between two tasks.

Author: Dukas, Reuven
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1995
Analysis, Learning in animals, Animal learning

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Recall of flower handling skills by bumble bees: a test of Darwin's interference hypothesis

Article Abstract:

Darwin's interference hypothesis on the recall of flower handling skills by bumble bees is tested using two plant species, comfrey and vetch. Results show that learning to handle flowers of one plant species does interfere with remembering previously learned flower handling skills. However, interference between flower handling methods does not account for the flower constancy of bumble bees visiting morphologically simple flowers such as vetch and comfrey.

Author: Woodward, Graham L., Laverty, Terence M.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1992
Research, Insect-plant relationships

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Effects of nectar variance on learning by bumble bees

Article Abstract:

The learning abilities of bumblebees in discriminating rewarding from non-rewarding flowers under four levels of nectar variance are evaluated. Although bees learn more slowly when there isvariance in nectar than when there is no variance, learning rates do not significantly decrease with an increase in nectar variance. Therefore, bumble bees base their foraging decisions from a certain maximum number of flowers sampled.

Author: Real, Leslie A., Dukas, Reuven
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Animal Behaviour
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0003-3472
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Behavior, Bumblebees
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Attractiveness of sand hoods built by courting male fiddler crabs, Uca musica: test of a sensory trap hypothesis
  • Abstracts: A progeroid syndrome in mice is caused by defects in A-type lamins. Lessons from human progeroid syndromes
  • Abstracts: Italian science gains budget boost, still awaits reform. Italy pursues cuts in manned space efforts. New biology institute in Milan prizes quality above loyalty in effort to become world-class
  • Abstracts: MITI reshuffles institutes to keep up with the times. MITI clears new path for Japan's universities
  • Abstracts: Performance of crosses among Hereford, Angus and Simmental cattle with different levels of Simmental breeding: VI. maternal heterosis of 3- to 8-year-old dams and the dominance model
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.