Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

'US politicians have fallen in love with basic research.'

Article Abstract:

The US research system distributes and fosters excellence through a strange mixture of genuine peer-review and unsophisticated political power-broking, managed by a quite disorganized network of competing agencies. During the 1990s, a new elite of life scientists emerged, and a future president will appoint a biologist as science advisor, turning away from the tradition of giving this position to a physicist. It is now recognized that science can boost both health and wealth.

Author: Macilwain, Colin
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Carnegie completes review of science-government ties

Article Abstract:

The Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government released in 1993 a summary report of the results of its review of science-government relations. The Carnegie Commission is a $10.7 million project initiated in 1988 to improve coordination between the government and the scientific community. The Carnegie Commission claims that the elevation of the post of science adviser to cabinet level and the improved liaison between government departments and federal agencies are some of its successes. However, critics said that whatever progress was made had occurred independently of the Carnegie Commission's efforts.

Author: Macilwain, Colin
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1993
United States, Reports, Science and technology policy, Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Real' fall in US research funding revealed

Article Abstract:

The drop in US R&D funding is greater than officially pronounced. A reassessment of total US spending on R&D by the National Academy of Sciences has revealed that this has declined by 5% since 1994, or more than double the 2% fall acknowledged by the Clinton administration. The fall in Federal Science and Technology support has been concealed in official figures, as these include non-research expenditures in the R&D budget. The new figure, which shows the extent to which support for science and technology has been declining, has raised doubts about the government's pronouncements to strengthen R&D.

Author: Macilwain, Colin
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1997
Finance, Industrial research, Federal aid to research, Government aid to research, Technology and state, Technology policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Science and state, Science policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Individual odour similarities across species parallel phylogenetic relationships in the S. ehrenbergi superspecies of mole-rats
  • Abstracts: Reproductive biology of captive male cottontop tamarin monkeys as a function of social environment. Detection of the chemical signals of ovulation in the cotton-top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus
  • Abstracts: A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies. Influence of mammal activity on nesting success of passerines
  • Abstracts: Cause-specific mortality and survival of white-tailed deer fawns in southwestern Lower Michigan. Survival of ruffed grouse chicks in northern Michigan
  • Abstracts: Big gains for biology and IT in Japanese science budget. Japanese budget boosts science funding. Japanese technology fund faces ministry criticism
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.