Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

And finally...

Article Abstract:

Purchasers of materials or designs in the UK construction industry should ensure they are fully tested in situ, before a final certificate is issued. It is possible some faults will not be found during testing and they are considered to be a commercial risk which purchasers are liable to take. A case heard in the UK courts involved Tarmac Roadstone. They found structural faults in their 14 million pounds sterling plant after the final certificate had been issued. it was built by Matthew hall Ortech. The High Court decided Ortech was not liable because the final certificate was in existence.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1998
Building, Developing, and General Contracting, Contract Construction, Interpretation and construction, Road construction industry, Construction law, Construction contracts, Tarmac Roadstone, Matthew Hall Ortech

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Jumping the queue

Article Abstract:

A recent case demonstrates how JCT81 can be by-passed, allowing subcontractors to be paid direct by an employer, if the main contractor has gone into liquidation. The case involves employer Londonderry Port Commissioners; main contractor McLaughlin & Harvey; and subcontractor B Mullan. JCT81 stipulates that subcontractors cannot be paid direct by an employer if the main contractor has gone into liquidation. Details of the case are included.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Payment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Making value judgements

Article Abstract:

A case heard in the Scottish Court of Sessions gives valuable guidance on how contractors can ensure a fair price for construction projects that have changed beyond the original contract. The case, ERDC Construction Ltd. v H.M. Love and Company Ltd., centres around refurbishment work in Edinburgh. Details of the case are presented.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1995
Construction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: e-mail domination. Taking the initiative. Taking a raincheck
  • Abstracts: Surgical scars. Taking over the asylum. Hammer beam horror
  • Abstracts: Community grading comes full circle. More MH community owners ranked in 8th annual Allen Report. A call to pride and professionalism
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2023 Advameg, Inc.