Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Courts order 'Markman' hearings early in cases

Article Abstract:

The "Markman hearing' is a procedural device spawned by the Supreme Court's 1996 decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., and has emerged as an increasingly effective way of achieving rapid settlement of patent litigation. Parties are requesting and district courts are ordering, early Markman hearings to resolve the scope of a patentee's rights, which often precipitates a settlement offer or a request for summary judgment. Parties considering patent litigation should be aware of the latest trends in such hearings.

Author: McCabe, Philip J., Smith, P. McCoy
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Patent law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Congress holds hearings in price increases and program access in the cable television industry, with an eye toward reforms that may increase competition

Article Abstract:

There may not be enough competition in the industry controlling multichannel video programming distribution (MVPD), and big price increases in the cable television industry as well as complaints about poor service have led to this view. Consumers complain about program access, which was the key competition-promoting effects of the Cable Television Consumer Protection Act of 1992. Four congressional hearings on competition have already been held in 1997, and one more has been scheduled.

Author: Olson, James W., Ayer, Jeffrey D.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Cable Television Systems, Cable Networks, Cable and other pay TV services, Management, Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Federal Communications Commission, Investigations, Cable television broadcasting industry, Cable television, Television program distribution companies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Malpractice; settlement claims

Article Abstract:

Claims against an attorney for mistakes in the settlement process include failure to advise clients fully about settlements' terms and failure to advise clients fully on the law's unsettled state. Sending clients all evidence, advising them of strategic decisions and why they are made, advising them of the settlement's pros and cons, and written communications whenever possible should be protective measures.

Author: Pettit, Douglas A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
United States

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Compromise and settlement, Cases, Settlements (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Consumer dealings. Debt collection and the Trade Practices Act
  • Abstracts: Moving forward on the development of minimum humanitarian standards. Jamaica withdraws the right of individual petition under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
  • Abstracts: Could mark owners sue media for generic use? Suits charging mark misuse could be filed, consistent with First Amendment principles
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.