Ethics committees, organ transplantation and public policy
Article Abstract:
Ethics committees may be asked to develop a general policy on eligibility and priority of types of patients for organ transplantation. The material facts initially introduced as relevant can affect the policy outcome; for example, clinicians' perspectives differ from those of immunologists, and comparative data is lacking when registries of transplantation outcomes are consulted. Ethical issues concerning organ acquisition may need to be addressed as well as criteria for allocating organs. Several approaches to allocation are possible, such as utility maximization, social equity, chronological order or lottery.
Publication Name: Law, Medicine & Health Care
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0277-8459
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Physicians and futile care: using ethics committees to slow the momentum
Article Abstract:
Ethics committees can help to resist the trend toward unilateral determinations of medical futility by physicians in favor of a broader social discussion on the issues involved in limiting health care. Physician authority should not be assumed because patient rights have been supported by the legal system, patients are better informed and there is as yet no social consensus on health care rationing. Besides, the costs associated with acceding to patient and family demands for futile care do not appear to be high.
Publication Name: Law, Medicine & Health Care
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0277-8459
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Politics, policies, and problems with organ transplantation: government regulation needed to ration organs equitably
Article Abstract:
Congress created the National Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) to direct the policies needed to allocate human organs to proper recipients. The regulators within the OPTN, however, have become a hindrance to efficient distribution. The Secretary of the Dept of Health and Human Services issued new rules in July 1998, that essentially retained the OPTN's management structure but did reorganize the criteria for organ allocation from a regional focus to a national focus.
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Treaties of friendship, commerce and navigation - effect on action for employment discrimination based on national origin - Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Abstracts: How nice companies can finish first. America's worst toxic polluters; eight companies with poor environmental records
- Abstracts: Nothing but Internet. Preemption doctrine after Cipollone - Nevada Supreme Court holds that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act impliedly preempts state common-law actions based on inadequate labelling
- Abstracts: Labor pains: the rights of the pregnant employee. A hardy transplant: the duty to accomodate and disability rights in Canadian labour law
- Abstracts: Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior