Organizational justice as determinants of member satisfaction: a teachers' association experience
Article Abstract:
Authors' abstract: In contrast to business firms, labor organizations have been reluctant to use general attitude surveys as a means of assessing member satisfaction. Drawing upon popular research in the organizational justice field, this study surveyed members of a teachers' association regarding there perceptions of procedural, distributive and interactional justice. Also surveyed were member attitudes toward dispute resolution handling. Results were noteworthy for justice and fairness in the evaluation of member satisfaction and union/association performance. Second, on a practical note, the study illustrates the ease by which survey questionnaires can be used and analyzed by public sector labor organizations,. The article begins with a review of the organizational justice literature.
Publication Name: Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0047-2301
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A historical look at the effect of collective bargaining on faculty salaries in California community colleges
Article Abstract:
Collective bargaining in higher education has occurred mainly in community colleges. Since the unionization of community college faculty was particularly rapid in California, that state provides a good arena for assessing the effect of unionization on professors' salaries. A study of California's 70 community college districts showed that unionization exerts a slight upward push on salary during the early part of bargaining but that this effect wanes over time. Market factors such a local competition for teachers affect salaries more than unionization.
Publication Name: Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0047-2301
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Perception of performance appraisal by employees and supervisors: self-serving bias and procedural justice
Article Abstract:
The authors examine research on employee satisfaction with performance appraisals. Results indicate employees who received adequate information prior to the appraisal, felt they were given a voice, and good conversational techniques used by supervisors enhanced satisfaction. Results also indicate supervisors had self-serving biases and felt they were more effective than their subordinates felt they were.
Publication Name: Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0047-2301
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Organizational justice: recognizing and rewarding the good citizen corporation. Participatory management within a theory of the firm
- Abstracts: Some observations on rehabilitation and justice. Attitudes, social problems and reconvictions in the 'STOP' probation experiment
- Abstracts: Revolution in international trade dispute settlements. Abuse by caretakers: arbitral views on discipline
- Abstracts: Fighting on the job: analysis of recent arbitration decisions. Preparing your client for mediation
- Abstracts: Public sector asphxiation: a time for action in collective bargaining. Employee power in conversions to cash balance plans: union, public, and electronic voice