The Supreme Court, Dr. Jekyll, and the due process of proof
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court's willingness to accept a state murder conviction in Montana v. Egelhoff in which exculpatory evidence was excluded suggests that the beyond a reasonable doubt standard may provide defendants with far less protection than commonly thought. In the case, the trial court allowed the defendant to admit evidence that he was too intoxicated to have committed he murder, but the court instructed the jury that the evidence of intoxication could not be used to rebut proof of intent. The Supreme Court found that states are free to exclude categories of exculpatory evidence.
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Regulating prison informers under the due process clause
Article Abstract:
The decision by the US Supreme Court in Arizona v Fulminante discussed confessions to prison informers and their impact on due process but failed to establish any useful guidelines. Fulminante's confession of a murder to a prison informer was deemed to have been coerced, the coerced confession was not a harmless error but some confessions to informers could be. The court failed to address the issue of the inherent unreliability of prison informers, responding instead to the due process issue. However, the government's use of prison informers is a due process issue.
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
State taxation and the dormant Commerce Clause: the object-measure approach
Article Abstract:
The Supreme Court's four-part test in Complete Auto v. Brady for determining whether a state tax violates the Commerce Clause by imposing a burden on interstate commerce is discussed. The authors recommend that the test be streamlined to a waive apportionment for nondiscriminatory taxes on activities that can be reached by only one state, and to require apportionment for nondiscriminatory taxes on activities which can be reached by more than one state.
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The Delaware Supreme Court, in two recent decisions, has clarified the application of the corporate-opportunity doctrine
- Abstracts: Consumer dealings. Debt collection and the Trade Practices Act
- Abstracts: The United States Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment: evolution from Warren to post-Warren perspectives
- Abstracts: The detective, the snout, and the audit commission: the real costs in using informants. Breaking the crime/drugs cycle: the birth of a new approach?
- Abstracts: The EU-U.S. compromise on the Helms-Burton and D'Amato Acts. International mavericks: a comparative analysis of selected human rights and foreign policy issues in Iran and the United States