The courts and private ADR: partners in serving justice
Article Abstract:
The courts and the private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system are independent systems of justice in some ways but interdependent in others. The two systems are independent because they use different techniques to resolve disputes. The systems are interdependent because the courts need ADR in order to decrease caseload, and ADR needs the courts to insure the integrity of the ADR system. ADR is a natural outcome of a continually evolving justice system.
Publication Name: Dispute Resolution Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1074-8105
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
ADR in technology disputes
Article Abstract:
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is appropriate for the technology industry. Technology professionals value confidentiality and speed, and ADR offers both. Technology can be difficult to understand, and ADR neutrals can be experts in the field. ADR is open to the creativity that works well with innovative technological professionals.
Publication Name: Dispute Resolution Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1074-8105
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Recalling the papers and the papers. CFTC shouldn't license the press
- Abstracts: The role of the corporate attorney within the takeover context: loyalties to whom? SEC enforcement actions against securities lawyers: new remedies vs. old policies
- Abstracts: ADR: the Siemens experience. Integrating ADR: a matter of legal practice
- Abstracts: The evolution of contractually mandated arbitration. Intellectual property: arbitrating disputes in the United States
- Abstracts: Mediating employment disputes under the Disabilities Act. Mediating disputes between banks and small businesses