Tribute to the human spirit: Anti-Monopoly's 2 decades in the U.S. courts
Article Abstract:
The legal saga of Ralph Anspach, inventor of the board game 'Anti-Monopoly,' is a fight of the little guy against toy industry monopolists who built their power anticompetitive mergers and of antitrust enforcement agencies refusing to do their job. Anspach first survived a long suit against Parker Bros., owner of the competing game 'Monopoly,' winning the right to keep and use his game's name. Hasbro, a larger toy company, bought out Parker and through added mergers controlled most of the board-game industry. The FTC approved all these acquisitions and Anspach has filed a private suit against Hasbro's predatory tactics.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
FTC-approved monopolization in the Anti-Monopoly case: killing an industry's infrastructure
Article Abstract:
The complaint filed by the plaintiff in Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc. in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York alleges numerous antitrust and unfair competition violations by the toy manufacturer and retailers Toys 'R' Us and K-Mart. The use of major retailers and no use of wholesalers by Hasbro, which possesses over 80% of the board game market, has the effect of foreclosing opportunities for smaller retailers and smaller game manufacturers. Injunctive relief and monetary damages are sought for price discrimination, restraint of trade, interference and monopolization.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Big is efficient? Merger to duopoly in the office-supply industry
Article Abstract:
The FTC in 1998 blocked the merger of Staples and Office Depot, two of the office supply industry's giant superstore chains. Issues involved are presented, as well as the agency's past practice of consenting to mergers more freely.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Caterpillar bulldozes the United Auto Workers. There's gold in the wind. Will MOX fuel guarantee a glowing future?
- Abstracts: An alternative to the not-ready-for the-year-2000 court system. Beyond dispute: a comment on ADR and human-rights adjudication
- Abstracts: No: the potential for good is too compelling. The clone age. Yes: individual dignity demands nothing less
- Abstracts: Common law exception permitting recovery of attorney's fees: use in appellate courts. Liability to spectators at sporting events
- Abstracts: Organizational freedom for banks: the case in support. "Gun-jumping" revisited: a proposal to prevent false starts in private offerings