A.T.&T. settles bias suit for $66 million; a nationwide effect is seen for women in the workplace
Article Abstract:
The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission agrees to a $66 million settlement of a case against AT&T that involves job discrimination in pregnancy. The case, which was originally filed in 1978 on behalf of 13,000 workers, challenged the maternity leave policies of Western Electric Inc, then the telephone equipment manufacturing unit of AT&T. Those policies included forcing pregnant women to take early maternity leave, taking them back at lower-skill and lower-paying jobs, not holding jobs for them as they did for men having surgery, limiting credit of time toward seniority. The settlement is the largest ever in a case handled by the EEOC; it includes about $6 million for legal costs. Payment should begin in 1992. The National Organization for Women views the agreement as an important advance, saying that rights for pregnant workers are now more adequately protected.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
More than labor amity at A.T.& T.: the once-combative bargaining partners are plotting the company's future
Article Abstract:
About 1,000 members of AT&T's work force met the week of Mar 8, 1993, to consider the company's future. Attendees included representatives of management and members of AT&T's two unions, which are the Communications Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. AT&T wants to change its corporate culture, and labor-management cooperation achieved by means of 'worker empowerment' is part of the company's plan. AT&T's unions look forward to a strengthened company commitment to employment security and training. Resistance to change is strongest from lower- and middle-management because managers perceive themselves as having the most to lose if there is a convergence of blue-collar and white-collar concerns.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: CBS settles sex-discrimination charges. WebTV settles deceptive ad charges
- Abstracts: Uniforet extends shutdown, lays off workers. Retirees see promise in self-employment
- Abstracts: The rules of evidence are being rewritten; lawyers are recording trials, and then letting the software sort out the facts
- Abstracts: Riding herd on iron horses, with fiber optics; electronic 'eyes' in Omaha watch over trains across the West. Just waiting for a great big blackout
- Abstracts: In southern India, a glimpse of Asia's high-tech future. Putting Price On Holocaust? Not Even Close