Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Overhauling social security

Article Abstract:

The debate about the need to overhaul the social security system is getting intense because with the retirement of baby boomers there is going to be an imbalance in the number of people paying and receiving social security. By 2010 millions of baby boomers will be retiring and the number of Generation X baby-busters may not be able to support them. This could lead to an increase in payroll taxes, a reduction in benefits or a restructuring of the system. Some believe that people should be allowed to invest their taxes in profitable private retirement plans. Congress is not expected to respond promptly.

Author: Glazer, Sarah
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1995
Analysis, Social security, Social security beneficiaries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Combating scientific misconduct; are government investigations unfair?

Article Abstract:

Controversy exists on how best to police scientific misconduct, and whether government investigations are fair. For example, Nobel laureate microbiologist David Baltimore became involved in charges against another scientist, with the case taking ten years until the charges were cleared in 1996, during which a congressional committee and two federal panels disagreed. The federal Office of Research Integrity has been criticized for its handling of other investigations besides Baltimore's coauthor.

Author: Glazer, Sarah
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1997
Political activity, Investigations, Political aspects, Science and state, Science policy, Whistle blowing, Whistleblowing, Fraud in science, Science fraud, Nobel laureates, Fraud investigation, Research ethics, Dingell, John D., Baltimore, David, United States. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Research Integrity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Teaching values: do school-based programs violate parents' beliefs?

Article Abstract:

The new character education movement in schools may become controversial because some people do not think schools can teach basic moral values to a diverse society without exploring issues such as homosexuality and abortion. Character education programs in US schools appear to be curbing violence and teen pregnancies besides providing social skills. More than one-third of respondents in a 1996 Gallup poll felt that teaching values should be delegated to parents and churches rather than schools.

Author: Glazer, Sarah
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1996
Social aspects, Education, Youth, Study and teaching, Sex education, Social values, Sex education for youth

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Ethical aspects
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Treating addiction: should the government try a new approach? Gun-free zones
  • Abstracts: Compelling signs of artificial life. High-tech limbs: adapting to an artificial leg can be gruelling. Dying by choice: an assisted suicide raises the issue anew
  • Abstracts: Off to the races with seabiscuit. Coming to a theater near you. O, captain, my captain: the elusive, A-list Peter Weir launches 'Master and Commander'
  • Abstracts: Privatizing G-7. Learning curve: at Waterloo, students are taught to solve real business problems. Pounded by the peso's fall
  • Abstracts: A security craze on Parliament Hill. Big-city traffic talk on the cottage wharf. Can there be art without grants?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.