Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Join the club: a modest proposal to increase availability of donor organs

Article Abstract:

Organ donation could be encouraged by limiting eligibility for transplant to those who had previously registered as potential donors. This approach would address the major problem associated with organ transplantation, the shortage of suitable donor organs. Two other solutions that have been proposed, a system of presumed consent unless the individual has opted out and a system of payment for organs, are less acceptable. The proposed scheme would both reduce demand and increase supply. If an oversupply resulted, then registered donors might be given first refusal and the program could be extended to non-donors.

Author: Jarvis, Rupert
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
Management, Donation of organs, tissues, etc., Tissue donation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Brain transplantation, personal identity and medical ethics

Article Abstract:

Experimentations on brain transplantations to treat Parkinson's disease is an issue that should be addressed by medical scientists and professionals. Brain transplantations are thought of as not only providing the physical brain of the donor but also altering the whole identity of the recipient. The donor's personality, as it is contained in the brain, could be the one reflected by the recipient after a successful transplantation. There would be confusion and distress in the recipient over the change in his identity brought about by the transplantation.

Author: Gillon, Raanan
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1996
Psychological aspects, Social policy, Identity, Medical ethics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


On giving preference to prior volunteers when allocating organs for transplantation

Article Abstract:

The scheme proposed by Rupert Jarvis for increasing the supply of organs for transplantation is not morally acceptable. Jarvis suggests that patients who have previously volunteered to donate organs should be given priority to receive organ transplants. The main objection to his proposal is that it allocates medical treatment on the basis of past or present fault. Introduction of any such fault-based criterion for withholding treatment is likely to be socially harmful.

Author: Gillon, Raanan
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Ethical aspects, Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc., Organ transplantation, Tissue transplantation, Transplantation, Health care rationing, Editorial
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Human resources opportunities to balance ethics and neoclassical economics in global labor standards. The ethics of inactivity: human resource managers and quietism
  • Abstracts: Peter Miller, axiology and environmental ethics. Value as richness: Peter Miller's challenge. Peter Miller, forestry and the ethics of integrity
  • Abstracts: Bad apples or bad bushel? Ethics, efficiency and capital market integrity. Global business ethics and codes
  • Abstracts: Reasons, relations, and commands: reflections on Darwall. Morality as equal accountability: comments on Stephen Darwall's "The Second-Person Standpoint"
  • Abstracts: Some ethical issues surrounding covert video surveillance - a response. Guidelines for the multi-agency management of patients suspected or at risk of suffering from life-threatening abuse resulting in cyanotic-apnoeic episodes
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.