Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Tough trade-offs: a free trade proposal with Mexico raises doubts about our country's commitment to human rights

Article Abstract:

The proposed free trade agreement between the US, Mexico and Canada should include safeguards to protect the human rights of Mexican workers in US-owned industries. These industries, called the Maquiladora, are likely to proliferate under the agreement as US firms find it profitable to move to Mexico where employment, health and environmental regulations are much less rigorous than in the US. However, Congress should insist on preserving human rights in the treaty to prevent the brutal exploitation of Mexican workers too poor to demand the standards enforced in the US.

Author: Gibbons, Thomas
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1992
Social aspects, Human resource management, International aspects, Mexico, Human rights, United States foreign relations, Mexican foreign relations, Offshore assembly industry, North American Free Trade Agreement (Proposed)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How much can you say in the workplace?

Article Abstract:

Courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have both ruled that a person's freedom of expression is not absolute in the workplace. Cases involving public employees have most directly concerned themselves with First Amendment rights in the workplace. Decisions in such cases suggest courts will first decide if the speech is a matter of public concern, then weigh the effect of the speech on the business' ability to function against the interest of the employee making the expression. English-only rules and harassing speech are also discussed.

Author: Kamer, Gregory J., Abbot, Scott M.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1995
Cases, Freedom of speech, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


E-mails are private unless an employee gives consent

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Deal v. Spears and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, while applying primarily to telephone communications, may also extend employee privacy rights to e-mail messages. In Deal, the employers violated the employee's privacy by taping conversations without consent and playing them back. The Act predates wide-spread use of electronic mail, but the statute applies to all electronic communications systems in the workplace that are not purely internal and allow some public access.

Author: Shear, Kenneth R.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Human Rights
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0046-8185
Year: 1996
Electronic mail systems, Email, Confidential communications

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Workers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Top ten threats to civil liberties in cyberspace. Renewing the commitment to individual rights. How to fight for civil liberties: choosing the right court
  • Abstracts: Time structure and purpose, Type A behavior, and the Protestant work ethic. Profiles of commitment: an empirical test
  • Abstracts: Negative action against Asian Americans: the internal instability of Dworkin's defense of affirmative action. Creating space for racial difference: the case for African-American schools
  • Abstracts: Women in the shadow of AIDS: are they the forgotten victims? Norplant: miracle drug or threat to women's rights?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.