Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 1996 - Abstracts

Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 1996
TitleSubjectAuthors
Beyond law and economics: theological ethics and the regulatory takings debate.LawDeCosse, David E.
Common law preemption: Alaska's limitation on private nuisance and due process.LawNwankwo, Oji K.
Conditional federal grants: can the government undercut lobbying by nonprofits through conditions placed on federal grants?LawMoody, Amy E.
Coughing up the cash: should Medicaid provide for independent state recovery against third-party tortfeasors such as the tobacco industry?LawMahoney, Michael K.
Dump it here, I need the money: restoration damages for temporary injury to real property held for personal use.LawBrown, Christopher E.
Electronic environmental permitting: panacea or Pandora's box?LawKelly, Michael J., Martin, Joyce M.
Empowerment lawyering: the role of trial publicity in environmental justice.LawJohnson, Jennifer L.
Environmental law as a mirror of the future: civic values confronting market force dynamics in a time of counter-revolution.LawPlater, Zygmunt J.B.
Groundwater jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act: the tributary groundwater dilemma.LawQuatrochi, Philip M.
In camera review of classified environmental impact statements: a threatened opportunity?LawMendelsohn, William R.
Is there a statute of limitations for skiing on filled wetlands? Interpreting 28 U.S.C. 2462 after United States v. Telluride Co.LawBrassard, Peter G.
Looking back: the full-time baseline in regulatory takings analysis.LawVenezia, Christine
Municipal recovery of natural resource damages under CERCLA.LawWittke, Michael J.
New England and the challenge of interstate ozone pollution under the Clean Air Act of 1990.LawWilcox, Geoffrey L.
Small-handles, big impacts: when should the National Environmental Policy Act require an environmental impact statement?LawFitzgerald, Mary K.
Something old, something new: applying the public trust doctrine to snowmaking.LawO'Donnell, Alethea
Steamrolling Section 7(d) of the Endangered Species Act: how sunk costs undermine environmental regulation.LawKopf, Jeffrey S.
The federal lead poisoning prevention program: inadequate guidance for an expeditious solution.LawBush, Jennifer L.
The Fourth Amendment warrant requirement in the environmental law context: can imminent harm to the environment justify a warrantless search?LawLamberski, Amy
The Industri-Plex Model: beneficial reuse of a Superfund site.LawFairbanks, Katherine
The legal thinghood of nonhuman animals.LawWise, Steven M.
The owl, the indian, the feminist, and the brother: environmentalism encounters the social justice movements.LawManus, Peter M.
The presumption of validity in American land-use law: a substitute for analysis, a source of significant confusion.LawHopperton, Robert J.
The public trust doctrine and the impossibility of "takings" by wildlife.LawCaspersen, Anna R.C.
Two cheers for shifting the presumption of validity: a reply to Professor Hopperton. (response to Robert J. Hopperton, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, vol. 23, p. 301, 1996)LawTarlock, A. Dan, Mandelker, Daniel R.
Why the Christian Right must protect the environment: theocentricity in the political workplace.LawBarlow, Chuck D.
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.