| Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 1999 |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| A critique of recent opinions of the Federal Circuit in patent interferences. | Law | Gholz, Charles L. |
| Address to American Inn of Court inaugural meeting, October 1, 1991.(Transcript) | Law | |
| Advice of counsel - defense or dilemma? Friend or foe? | Law | Collins, Bryan P., Sirilla, George M., Hess, Adam R. |
| An analysis of the patentee's new exclusive right to "offer to sell." | Law | Garlepp, Edwin D. |
| An economic review and suggessted approach for licensing patent applications. | Law | Schaafsma, Paul E. |
| A new approach to worldwide harmonization of patent law. | Law | Bardehle, Heinz |
| Antitrust counterclaims in patent infringement litigation: clarifying the Supreme Court's enigmatic Mercoid decision. | Law | Donahey, Teague I. |
| Antitrust liability for attempting to enforce a fraudulent patent. | Law | Chandra, Arun |
| A patent examining paradigm. | Law | Jagannathan, Vasu |
| A Rich legacy.(Judge Jiles S. Rich, formerly of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) | Law | Mueller, Janice M. |
| Armed and ready: defeating patent infringement claims by summary judgment. | Law | Ayers, Peter J. |
| Constitutionality of a multi-national patent system.(part 1) | Law | Okey, David W. |
| Constitutionality of a multi-national patent system, part II. | Law | Okey, David W. |
| Did you ever notice? Official notice in rejections.(patent applications) | Law | Barry, Lance Leonard |
| Different inventive entities under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) and affidavit practice under 37 C.F.R. 1.132. | Law | Capes, Nelson R., Hess, Rebecca D. |
| Doctrine of equivalents adds torque to Japanese patent infringement. | Law | Tessensohn, John A., Yamamoto, Shusako |
| Fidelity.(Judge Giles S. Rich of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) | Law | Duft, Bradford J. |
| Innovation and the structure of competition: future markets in European and American law.(part 2) | Law | Landman, Lawrence B. |
| Innovation and the structure of competition.(Future Markets in European and American Law, part I) | Law | Landman, Lawrence B. |
| Innovation and the structure of competititon: future markets in European and American law.(part 3) | Law | Landman, Lawrence B. |
| Intellectual property strategies for protecting the looks of a new product. | Law | Hanson, Karl G. |
| Is extrinsic evidence ever necessary to resolve claim construction disputes? | Law | Y'Barbo, Douglas |
| Is extrinsic evidence necessary to resolve: claim construction disputes?(part I) | Law | Y'Barbo, Douglas |
| Litigating obviousness: a new approach for using expert witnesses. | Law | Sganga, John B., Jr. |
| No relief in sight: difficulties in obtaining judgements in Europe using EPO issued patents.(European Patent Office) | Law | Coletti, Paul A. |
| Patent eligibility in view of State Street and AT&T v. Excel Communications. | Law | Kunin, Stephen G. |
| Patenting around nuisance prior art. | Law | Wainwright, David S. |
| Principal opinions affecting PTO trademark practice.(Patent and Trademark Office) | Law | Samuels, Jeffrey M., Samuels, Linda B. |
| Quality review and control in the PTO: the historical evolution.(Patent and Trademark Office) | Law | Corcoran, Robert |
| Quantity accretion: mirror image of price erosion from patent infringement. | Law | Werden, Gregory J., Froeb, Luke M., Beavers, Lucian Wayne |
| Reducing a company's risk over domain name disputes. | Law | Cyrlin, Alan I. |
| Reducing the costs of obtaining and maintaining Japanese patents. | Law | Kodama, Hideo, Tekanic, Jeffrey D. |
| Reengineering the patent examination process: two suggestions. | Law | Toedt, D.C. |
| Remedy and bonding law under Section 337: a primer for the patent litigator. | Law | Schwartz, Bryan A. |
| Some comments on contributory and induced patent infringement; implications for software developers. | Law | Basinski, Erwin J. |
| Statement of Q. Todd Dickinson before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property on March 25, 1999. | Law | |
| Statement of the P.T.O.S. to the U.S.P.T.O. on Interim Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications under the 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph "written description" requirement.(Patent & Trademark Office Society, U.S. Patent & Trademark Office) | Law | |
| The corporate right of publicity in federal dilution legislation. | Law | Boylan, Kristine M. |
| The developing standard for irreparable harm in preliminary injunctions to prevent patent infringement. | Law | Mills, John G. |
| The Interim Written Description Guidelines -- one correlation too many?(biotechnological patent applications) | Law | Woessner, Warren D. |
| The new "unintentional" revival rules: panacea or pitfall? | Law | Brinckerhoff, Courtenay C., Saxe, Bernhard D. |
| The on-sale bar after Pfaff v. Wells Electronics: toward a bright-line rule. | Law | McAndrews, Isabelle R. |
| The past, present, and future of copyright protection of soundalike recordings. | Law | Milunovich, Kent |
| The scope of equivalents under 35 U.S.C. s. 112 para. 6 should vary depending on importance of the means-plus-function recitation to the invention as a whole.(1952 Patent Act) | Law | Brownlee, David W. |
| The use of delaying tactics to obtain submarine patents and amend around a patent that a competitor has designed around. | Law | Blount, Steve |
| Viability of the Hilmer doctrine. | Law | Neifeld, Richard A. |
| When law, science and technology worlds collide: copyright issues on the Internet. | Law | Amrozowicz, Paul D. |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
