| Philosophy & Public Affairs 1996 |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| A continuum argument for intransitivity. (in ethical judgments) | Political science | Temkin, Larry S. |
| Acts and outcomes: a reply to Boonin-Vail. (response to David Boonin-Vail in this issue, p. 267). | Political science | Parfit, Derek |
| Cognitive disability, misfortune, and justice. | Political science | McMahan, Jeff |
| Don't stop thinking about tomorrow: two paradoxes about duties to future generations. | Political science | Boonin-Vail, David |
| Dworkin and Casey on abortion.(Ronald Dworkin, Planned Parenthood v. Casey) | Political science | Stroud, Sarah |
| Liability and risk.(risk liability theory) | Political science | McCarthy, David |
| Liberalism, samaritanism, and political legitimacy. | Political science | Wellman, Christopher H. |
| Making sense of sexual harassment law. | Political science | Altman, Andrew |
| Moral status as the impermissibility of minimizing violations. | Political science | Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper |
| Objectivity and truth: you'd better believe it. (against archimedean skepticism) | Political science | Dworkin, Ronald M. |
| Theoretical persons and practical agents. | Political science | Shoemaker, David W. |
| The uniqueness of the Holocaust. | Political science | Margalit, Avishai, Motzkin, Gabriel |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
