Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Intel is upheld on copyright for 486 chip: Advanced Micro is barred from selling clones that copy software

Article Abstract:

Federal Judge William Ingram rules that Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) does not have the right to copy microcode software that Intel Corp uses in its 80486 microprocessors. The ruling means that Intel will continue to enjoy a virtual monopoly on the best-selling 486 chips until a competitor can come up with a different microcode. AMD had planned to introduce a 486 clone using Intel microcode as early as late Dec 1992. The company is developing a second version of the chip with microcode that will not infringe on Intel's copyright, but that version will not be ready to ship before mid-1993. The ruling does not affect AMD's clone of Intel's 386 microprocessor.

Author: Yamada, Ken
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1992
Microprocessor, CPUs (Central processing units), Microprocessors, Intellectual property, Compatibility (Computers), Compatible Hardware, Patent, Microcode, Intel 80486 (Microprocessor)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Advanced Micro set back in suit against Intel

Article Abstract:

A federal judge has ruled against Advanced Micro Devices Corp in a major part of Advanced Micro's antitrust lawsuit against Intel Corp. Advanced Micro charges that Intel uses unfair practices to dominate the market for microprocessors. Specifically, Advanced Micro charges that Intel tried to illegally destroy a 1982 agreement between the companies. Advanced Micro says the agreement was supposed to give Advanced Micro the right to manufacture Intel's 80386 chips. Judge James Ware has ruled against Advanced Micro, noting that there is a statute of limitations of four years that applies in such cases. Advanced Micro, says Judge Ware, waited too long.

Author: McCoy, Charles
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1991
Legal Issues, Antitrust Laws, Lawsuits, Semiconductor Industry

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Semiconductor industry, Cases, Intel Corp., INTC, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., AMD
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Judge says Intel doesn't hold right to '386' name. Advanced Micro Devices charges Intel in anti-trust suit seeking $2 billion
  • Abstracts: Advanced Micro's results decline from prior quarter. Advanced Micro results spurted in 1st quarter
  • Abstracts: IBM trumpets sales milestone for OS/2 as skeptical Microsoft blows own horn
  • Abstracts: Intel is slashing its chip prices by up to 35%: research capital spending to be increased for 1992 in bid to maintain lead
  • Abstracts: NCR posts 24% drop in 4th-period net; cost of fighting AT&T bid hurt results. NCR's stock jumps on news of ESOP plan; traders say defensive move may draw a higher bid from AT&T, force sale
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.