Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, international

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, international

Releasing Pinochet

Article Abstract:

Augusto Pinochet, former dictator of Chile, may be sent home from Britain to Chile on grounds of poor health, though he is sought to stand trial in Spain on torture charges. The case has meant that dictators can no longer indulge in torture, murder and arbitrary arrest and believe that they will never face justice, even after losing power. A former head of state is no longer seen as immune from proescution over human rights abuses. Switzerland, Belgium and France are also calling for Pinochet to be extradited, which emphasizes greater willingness to tackle crimes of former dictators when they go abroad.

Publisher: Economist Newspaper Ltd.
Publication Name: The Economist (UK)
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0013-0613
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Jack Straw and General Pinochet

Article Abstract:

United Kingdom home secretary, Jack Straw, has to make a decision on former Chilean dictator, General Augusto Pinochet. Straw has to decide whether to permit the courts to go through an extradition process. The Law Lords have ruled that Pinochet's having been a head of state does not bestow immunity on him. The safest refuge for Jack Straw is the law, and political and emotional issues can be left to one side. The leader of the Conservative party, William Hague, argues that Pinochet should go back to Chile, as though the legal issues could be ignored.

Publisher: Economist Newspaper Ltd.
Publication Name: The Economist (UK)
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0013-0613
Year: 1998
United Kingdom, Chile, British foreign relations, Chilean foreign relations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Confusion over Pinochet

Article Abstract:

The British Law Lords have decided that Augusto Pinochet can be extradited, but that he should only face charges for offenses that it is claimed he committed after Dec 1988. This is a confusing decision which will not help with the development of human rights law. There have been seven separate judgements from the Law Lords, each one different. The latest decision leaves loopholes which ordinary criminals could exploit, and leave Britain a safe place for criminals to hide in.

Publisher: Economist Newspaper Ltd.
Publication Name: The Economist (UK)
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0013-0613
Year: 1999
United Kingdom. Parliament. House of Lords

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Editorial, Laws, regulations and rules, Human rights, Pinochet, Augusto, Extradition
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Malaysian palm oil heats up: Conditions converge for old economy player. MAS: back in black in 2003
  • Abstracts: Crunch time for General Motors. GM's motor man. Losing its grip
  • Abstracts: First Capital, First USA in credit-card deal. Standard Chartered to buy a chase business. Credit-card firm eludes Bank Leumi
  • Abstracts: Amazon.com's loss widened in quarter despite sales jump. Amazon reports its loss widens in 3rd quarter. Amazon.com is expecting good 4th-quarter results
  • Abstracts: One house, many windows. The net gets real. The big leap
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.