Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Contamination of land

Article Abstract:

A House of Lords ruling in the case of Cambridge Water Co. v Eastern Counties Leather indicates that liability for the pollution of adjoining land can only be established if the defendant knew, or should have foreseen, that potentially polluting substances might, if they were to escape, cause damage to neighbouring land. It was deemed that the Rylands v Fletcher rule, under which pollution of adjoining land was regarded as a liability offence without proof of fault, only applies a general rule of strict liability where there is a claim for damages resulting from an isolated escape.

Author: Tolson, Simon
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1997
Toxic torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A handy little friend to know

Article Abstract:

Knowledge of the Romalpa clause is valuable to a supplier who has not received payment from a purchaser before the purchaser becomes bankrupt. This clause, named after a case involving Romalpa Aluminium, allows the supplier to claim ownership of the goods and to have their claim take precedence over other those of other creditors. There are three tests of the validity of a Romalpa claim. The goods must be capable of separation from other goods, they should have a clear retention of title by the supplier, and the supplier must have placed a fiduciary obligation on the buyer.

Author: Tolson, Simon
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Bankruptcy law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Keep out of harm's way

Article Abstract:

When attempting to establish guilt under the terms of the Health and Safety at Work Act, it has been necessary to establish an individual's rather than corporate guilt. The Law Commission's recommendation that 'corporate killing' should become an offence is discussed.

Author: Tolson, Simon
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 2000
Criminal liability of juristic persons, Juristic persons criminal liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Column
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Fatal adaption. An end to shafting. Is there a bond that works?
  • Abstracts: Making sense of Web terminology. E-mail lists: one-to-one marketing tools. E-mail or snail mail: why not both?
  • Abstracts: Clampdown date. The right to holidays. Sacking offences
  • Abstracts: Innovations in R&D labs. Time for change at the U.S. Mint. Warming trend: cold applications of modified bitumen systems
  • Abstracts: FTC issues guidelines on online ads. OTC listed shell company to take products online. Retro-Fit moves to online entertainment merchandising
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.