Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Don't skimp on the details

Article Abstract:

Construction contractors who carry out defective work could find that they are involved in a criminal prosecution. The UK's Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 requires all those engaged in construction to conduct their work in a manner that exposes others to health and safety risks. The prosecution of a construction contractor accused of endangering public safety when a portion of a suspended ceiling in a supermarket collapsed, even though no-one was in danger, shows that the industry must be aware of the health and safety consequences of their work, should it fail.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1996
Building, Developing, and General Contracting, Contract Construction, Construction contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Litigation to get you all steamed up

Article Abstract:

The case of Mowlem v Phippen Randall and Parkes and Eagle Star has serious implications for architects. Mowlem alleges that architects Phippen Randall and Parkes colluded with the employer, Eagle Star to damage it and to defer payment knowing that Eagle Star could not pay. The claim is made under economic tort which concerns unlawful interference in a contract by a third party. If Mowlem is successful, architects will be personally liable where there is a claim against an employer that has gone bankrupt.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Architects, Malpractice, Torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The burden of proof

Article Abstract:

It is wrong for building disputes centering on final account discussions to require proof beyond reasonable doubt before agreement can be reached. It is reasonable that disputes over claims in a civil court should be proved, but not beyond reasonable doubt, which should be reserved for criminal prosecutions.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Leyton fire station. The garden house. Waverley Special School
  • Abstracts: JCT80's creature of the contract rears. Quandry over issue of non-completion. SFA is a performer of ample talents
  • Abstracts: Reading through the post addressed to John Major. Fond memories of a Houseful of personalities
  • Abstracts: Main contractor to quote for hold-ups. Overhauling formal logic
  • Abstracts: QSs should perform as they demand performance. Something for nothing: clients are taking contractors for a ride by using the pricing information provided free in tenders to redesign projects and rejig their budgets
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.